ReviewCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2024
Beneficiaries' satisfaction with community-based health insurance services and associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Disparities in modern health service utilization between community-based health insurance member and non-member households in Ethiopia: a meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Multilevel Analysis of Women's Perceptions of Community-Based Health Insurance on Healthcare Access in Sidama Region, Ethiopia: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Determinants of satisfaction with community-based health insurance schemes among beneficiaries with chronic diseases in selected public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia: A multicenter study.SAGE open medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe viability of community-based health insurance programs depends on beneficiary satisfaction, and healthcare systems evaluate performance through patient reports and ratings to ensure effectiveness and service quality. To our knowledge, Ethiopia lacks national pooled data on the satisfaction of community-based health insurance beneficiaries and related factors. As a result, this review aimed to evaluate the level of beneficiaries' satisfaction with the scheme's services and associated factors in Ethiopia.
methodsDatabase searches on Scopus, Hinari, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Semantic Scholar were conducted on September 1st, 2022. Thirteen studies were chosen for review from the search results. Checklists from the Joan Briggs Institute were used to evaluate the risk of bias for the included studies. The data were extracted using a 2019 Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using Stata 17. The odds ratios at p-values less than 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval were used to evaluate the effect estimates.
resultsThe pooled satisfaction of beneficiaries with community-based health insurance was found to be 66.0% (95% CI = 57-76%) and was found to be influenced by socio-demographic, health service-related, the scheme's related factors, and the beneficiaries' knowledge of it. The beneficiary satisfaction levels were highest in the Amhara region, at 69.0% (95% CI = 59-79%), followed by Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples' Region (SNNPR) at 67.0% (95% CI = 40-94%), Oromia at 63.0% (95% CI = 58-68%), and Addis Ababa at 53.0% (95% CI = 45-62%).
conclusionEven though there was a moderate level of satisfaction, there are indications that the quality of health services and the coverage of the entire population lag behind, necessitating greater efforts to achieve universal health coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.