ArticleBMC psychiatry2024
Cross-sectional study about suicide ideation and attempts among Brazilian pre-adolescents.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Adverse childhood experiences and suicidality in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ global health · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuicide is a global public health problem. In childhood, the risk factors are less clear, highlighting family and individual factors. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and sociodemographic, social, family, and individual factors associated with suicide ideation and attempts in pre-adolescents in a Brazilian city.
methodsThe sample comes from a cohort of 500 schoolchildren of a city in Rio de Janeiro/Brazil. The data are analyzed cross-sectionally. The research incorporated data from the years 2005, 2006, and 2008 to evaluate suicide ideation and attempts in childhood, as reported by parents/caregivers, teachers and children. A hierarchical logistic model evaluated the association between the explanatory variables related to sociodemographic, social, family, and individual factors and the outcome.
results22.2% of the children (95% CI 18.0%-27.0%) had suicide ideation/attempts, reported either by their mothers, teachers, or the child at some point in a cohort. The following variables were associated with suicidal ideation/attempts in the final adjusted model: regular or poor quality of relationship with friends (OR = 1.84; 95% CI 1.31-2.58), having a family member incarcerated (OR = 1.44; 95% CI 1.07-1.92) and having worse performance in portuguese or mathematics than other students (OR = 2.05; 95% CI 1.29-3.26).
conclusionSuicidal behavior in childhood is severe and affects everyone around the case, demanding to promote friendships, helping with school activities, and providing greater support and attention to children at risk. Bad relationships with friends and incarcerated family members are particularly key risk factors for suicide ideation and attempts. It is essential to improve prevention policies and to disseminate protective behaviors. There is a critical need to augment community mental health resources, mainly in less developed countries and regions that lack these services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.