ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2024
Factors influencing the discontinuation of biologic therapies in patients with ulcerative colitis.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe therapeutic landscape for ulcerative colitis (UC) has recently broadened to include anti-TNFα, anti-integrin, and anti-IL-12/23p40 antibody agents. These biological agents are tailored to individual patient profiles. However, some patients cease biological treatment. This study investigates factors influencing the discontinuation of biological treatment in UC patients.
methodsThis retrospective single-cohort study encompasses UC patients who commenced treatment with biological agents like infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab from April 2019 to March 2022. Patients were categorized into continuation and discontinuation groups based on their one-year treatment status. Baseline characteristics were compared between the groups.
resultsOf the 116 UC patients, 102 were included in the study. Among these, 74 (72.5%) continued and 28 (27.5%) discontinued biological therapy. Discontinuation rates for infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab were 33.3%, 25.0%, 50.0%, 30.2%, and 15.6%, respectively. The primary discontinuation reason was lack of efficacy (85.7%), followed by adverse events (7.1%), pregnancy (3.6%), and death (3.6%). The discontinuation group had a significantly lower rate of concomitant thiopurine compared to the continuation group (28.6% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.0132). Multivariable analysis revealed that concomitant thiopurine was independently associated with therapy continuation (p = 0.0075).
conclusionThe study indicates that concomitant thiopurine significantly correlates with the continuation of biological therapies in UC patients, underscoring the importance of concomitant thiopurine in sustaining biological therapy. Further studies are warranted to assess the efficacy of combination therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.