ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
A time series algorithm to predict surgery in neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does timing of surgery make the difference in outcomes for preterm infants with NEC?Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in thyroid ultrasound: clinical applications and perspectives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Clinical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Feeding Intolerance After Surgery for Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDetermining the optimal timing of surgical intervention for Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) poses significant challenges. This study develops a predictive model using the long short-term memory network (LSTM) with a focal loss (FL) to identify infants at risk of developing Bell IIB + NEC early and issue timely surgical warnings.
methodsData from 791 neonates diagnosed with NEC are gathered from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), encompassing 35 selected features. Infants are categorized into those requiring surgical intervention (n = 257) and those managed medically (n = 534) based on the Mod-Bell criteria. A fivefold cross-validation approach is employed for training and testing. The LSTM algorithm is utilized to capture and utilize temporal relationships in the dataset, with FL employed as a loss function to address class imbalance. Model performance metrics include precision, recall, F1 score, and average precision (AP).
resultsThe model tested on a real dataset demonstrated high performance. Predicting surgical risk 1 day in advance achieved precision (0.913 ± 0.034), recall (0.841 ± 0.053), F1 score (0.874 ± 0.029), and AP (0.917 ± 0.025). The 2-days-in-advance predictions yielded (0.905 ± 0.036), recall (0.815 ± 0.057), F1 score (0.857 ± 0.035), and AP (0.905 ± 0.029).
conclusionThe LSTM model with FL exhibits high precision and recall in forecasting the need for surgical intervention 1 or 2 days ahead. This predictive capability holds promise for enhancing infants' outcomes by facilitating timely clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.