Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39425097›Full record

SynthesisOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024

Addressing cancer survivors' information needs and satisfaction: a systematic review of potential intervention components for survivors with a rare cancer type.

Tamsin Farrugia, Saskia F A Duijts, Carlene Wilson, Laura Hemming, Christine Cockburn, Evelien Spelten

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Vaginal and vulvar cancer patient experiences of the information pathway from pre-diagnosis to treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tamsin FarrugiaViolet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC, 3552, Australia. t.farrugia@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID 0009-0007-2708-1188
Saskia F A DuijtsViolet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC, 3552, Australia.
Carlene WilsonMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Laura HemmingViolet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC, 3552, Australia.
Christine CockburnRare Cancers Australia, 122/302-306 Bong Bong St, Bowral, NSW, 2576, Australia.
Evelien SpeltenViolet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC, 3552, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveProviding current, evidence-based information to cancer survivors is critical for informed decision making. People diagnosed with a rare cancer report higher unmet information needs compared to common cancer survivors. However, interventions providing informational support for rare cancers are limited. Therefore, the aims of this systematic review were to identify and synthesise interventions decreasing survivors' information needs and/or improving satisfaction with information, and to explore potential components to be included in an intervention for rare cancer survivors.

methodsSearches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library. Studies reporting an intervention targeting information needs and/or patient satisfaction with information in survivors of any cancer type were included. Data were extracted, a quality assessment performed and findings were synthesised.

resultsA total of 7012 studies were identified and 34 were included in the review. Five studies targeted patients with a rare cancer type; the remaining studies included common cancer survivors. Interventions varied in relation to the mode of information provision, timing of intervention delivery, and the intervention provider. The most promising interventions included face-to-face communication and written material and were delivered by a nurse. All rare cancer studies were designed around a web-based program, but none of them improved outcomes.

conclusionsInterventions targeting information needs and/or patient satisfaction with information in rare cancer survivors are lacking. Future studies should focus on this underserved group, and successful aspects of interventions for common cancer survivors should be considered for inclusion when designing an intervention for rare cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsPatient SatisfactionHumansNeoplasmsRare DiseasesInformation needsOncologyRare cancerSatisfaction with informationSupportive care

Identifiers

PMID39425097
PMCPMC11488126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.