Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39425090›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

General hospital patients' attitude towards systematic health risk behavior screening and intervention.

Caroline Timm, Filipa Krolo-Wicovsky, Anika Tiede, Marie Spielmann, Beate Gaertner, Ulrich John, Jennis Freyer-Adam

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05365269 (Proactive Automatized Lifestyle Intervention for Cancer Prevention), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05365269 nacompletednot on this map

Proactive Automatized Lifestyle Intervention for Cancer Prevention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medicine GreifswaldRan2022 to 2023Enrolled175ConditionsHealth Risk BehaviorsArmsProactive Automatized Lifestyle intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caroline TimmInstitute for Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther- Rathenau-Str. 48, D-17475, Greifswald, Germany. caroline.timm@stud.uni-greifswald.de.
Filipa Krolo-WicovskyInstitute for Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther- Rathenau-Str. 48, D-17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Anika TiedeInstitute for Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther- Rathenau-Str. 48, D-17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Marie SpielmannInstitute for Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther- Rathenau-Str. 48, D-17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Beate GaertnerDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute Berlin, General- Pape-Str. 62-66, D-12101, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrich JohnInstitute for Community Medicine, Department Prevention Research and Social Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther- Rathenau-Str. 48, D-17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Jennis Freyer-AdamInstitute for Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther- Rathenau-Str. 48, D-17475, Greifswald, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystematic counseling on behavioral health risk factors (HRFs) may be suitable to promote health among general hospital patients. This study aimed to investigate the openness of patients towards systematic screening and intervention of HRFs, its relation to actual participation in a multi-behavioral intervention, and whether socio-economic characteristics, HRFs and health indicators are related to approval.

methodsAll 18- to 64-year-old patients hospitalized in five medical departments at the University Medicine Hospital Greifswald in Germany were asked between May and July 2022 to participate in a survey and in a subsequent pre-post intervention study. Among all eligible patients, 225 (78.9%) participated in the survey. Patients' approval of systematic screening and intervention of HRFs was assessed using five statements with a total sum score of 0-20 (i.e., scores of 0-6, 7-13, 14-20 referring to low, medium and high approval). Associations with intervention participation, socio-economic, behavioral and health-related patient characteristics were analyzed using logistic and multivariable linear regression analyses.

resultsThe mean total approval of screening and intervention was 13.8 (SD = 4.8). Of the 125/ 73/ 16 patients with high/ medium/ low approval, 88.0%/ 78.1%/ 50.0% participated in the subsequent intervention, respectively. Approval was independent of socio-demographic and -economic characteristics and self-rated general health. Current tobacco smoking was the only HRF negatively (p = 0.02) and diabetes mellitus was the only disease positively (p = 0.01) associated with approval.

conclusionHigh approval of HRF screening, which was rather independent of socio-economic characteristics and worse self-rated general health, speaks in favor of proactively approaching and motivating all general hospital patients to participate in health behavior change intervention. Tobacco smokers might need higher efforts to motivate participation than non-smokers.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05365269 on May 9, 2022.

Indexed as

Health Risk BehaviorsHospitals, GeneralAdolescentAdultAttitude to HealthFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBehavior change counselingHealth behaviorHealth risk factorsPatient approval

Identifiers

PMID39425090
PMCPMC11490053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.