Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39425088›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2024

Early robotic gait training after stroke (ERA Stroke): study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Fernando Zanela da Silva Areas, Sara Baltz, Jaime Gillespie, Christa Ochoa, Taylor Gilliland, Rosemary Dubiel, Monica Bennett, Simon Driver, Chad Swank

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06430632 (Early Robotic Gait Training After Stroke), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06430632 narecruitingnot on this map

Early Robotic Gait Training After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaylor Research InstituteRan2024 to 2026Enrolled54ConditionsStrokeArmsRobotic Gait Training, Usual Care Gait Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fernando Zanela da Silva AreasBaylor Scott & White Research Institute, 909 N. Washington, Suite 232, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Sara BaltzBaylor Scott & White Research Institute, 909 N. Washington, Suite 232, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Jaime GillespieBaylor Scott & White Research Institute, 909 N. Washington, Suite 232, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Christa OchoaBaylor Scott & White Research Institute, 909 N. Washington, Suite 232, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Taylor GillilandBaylor Scott & White Research Institute, 909 N. Washington, Suite 232, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Rosemary DubielBaylor Scott & White Institute for Rehabilitation, Dallas, TX, USA.
Monica BennettBaylor Scott & White Research Institute, 909 N. Washington, Suite 232, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Simon DriverBaylor Scott & White Research Institute, 909 N. Washington, Suite 232, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Chad SwankBaylor Scott & White Research Institute, 909 N. Washington, Suite 232, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA. Chad.Swank@BSWHealth.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWalking impairment after stroke is associated with substantial limitations in functional independence, quality of life, and long-term survival. People in the subacute phase after stroke who are unable to walk are most likely to benefit the greatest from use of overground robotic gait training (RGT). This study will provide preliminary evidence regarding the clinical use and efficacy of RGT during the subacute phase of stroke recovery as well as observational findings associated with the safety, tolerability, feasibility, and cost of delivering RGT during inpatient stroke rehabilitation.

methodsThis prospectively registered randomized controlled trial will enroll 54 patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation within six months of stroke. Admitted patients will be screened at admission to inpatient rehabilitation for eligibility. Consented patients will be randomized based on stroke severity to receive either RGT or usual care for 90 minutes per week of gait training intervention during inpatient rehabilitation length of stay. Patients will complete assessments on walking and health outcomes at admission and discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and at 1- and 3-month follow-up. Intent-to-treat and per protocol analysis will be performed to evaluate safety [rate of adverse events, visual analog scale, and treatment completion rate], walking function [gait speed via 10-Meter Walk Test, Functional Ambulation Category, gait endurance via 6-Minute Walk Test] and health outcomes [Modified Rankin Scale, Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement, Continuity Assessment Record and Evaluation Tool, 5 Times Sit-to-Stand Test, Berg Balance Scale, and Stroke Impact Scale-16], and cost-analysis. DISCUSSION: This study will provide foundational evidence regarding the clinical use and efficacy of a RGT program during the subacute phase of stroke recovery with specific findings associated with the safety, tolerability, feasibility, and cost-analysis of delivering RGT during inpatient stroke rehabilitation.

trial registrationNCT06430632.

Indexed as

RoboticsStroke RehabilitationAgedExercise TherapyFemaleGaitGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionStrokeTreatment OutcomeBrain injuryFunctional recoveryNeurological rehabilitationRobotic exoskeletonStroke

Identifiers

PMID39425088
PMCPMC11487695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.