ArticleBMC cancer2024
Early Onset Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (EOPAC): presentation, clinical course and treatment outcomes in comparison to Average Onset Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (AOPAC): a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinicopathological differences and risk factors of early- versus late-onset pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.iScience · 2026Article
- Mesopancreas excision in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: recurrence patterns - a single-arm descriptive study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) is a disease of decimal prognosis, with around 50% of patients presenting with metastatic disease. Previous trials reported a high incidence of early onset pancreatic cancer (EOPAC) in Egypt, presenting about 25% of patients with PAC. The clinic-pathological features and prognosis of EOPAC needs more study. PATIENTS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis of patients' records at Shefa Al-Orman comprehensive cancer center database. Patients with histo-pathologically confirmed diagnosis of PAC. We categorized patients according to the age at diagnosis into EOPAC (≤ 50 years) and average onset PAC (AOPAC). Data on risk factors, family history, presenting symptoms, clinic-pathological features, treatment, and prognosis were extracted. Patients with histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of pancreatic cancer diagnosed between December 2016-December 2022 were included.
resultsThe study cohort consisted of 412 patients. EOPAC represented 20.3% of patients, with no significant differences in risk factors and family history compared to AOPAC. Duration of symptoms before diagnosis is longer in EOPAC, with the majority of EOPAC presenting with localized disease (23.8%) and locally advanced tumors (28.5%) compared to AOPAC. AOPAC presented more with metastatic disease (64% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.003). EOPAC are usually submitted to more aggressive treatment including radical surgery, neoadjuvant therapy, and aggressive chemotherapy regimens in metastatic disease. Disease free survival (DFS) of EOPAC was shorter than AOPAC (11 months vs. 17 months, p = 0.889), but overall survival OS was significantly longer in EOPAC (10 months vs. 6 months, p = 0.013).
conclusionPatients with EOPAC in Egypt represent around 25% of cases. EOPAC tend to have a shorter disease free survival (DFS) in patients presenting with localized disease. The overall survival (OS) is longer in EOPAC compared to AOPAC. Further studies are mandatory to identify the epidemiological and risk factors of EOPAC in Egypt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.