Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39425071›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

An investigation of the impact of 'Living with COVID' on workplace COVID-19 transmission risk, response and resilience - lessons learnt and future challenges.

Catherine Lewis, Sheena Johnson, Claire Mann, Janet Ubido, Bernadine Farrell, Anna Coleman, Martie van Tongeren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Catherine LewisDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. catherine.lewis@manchester.ac.uk.
Sheena JohnsonAlliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Claire MannAlliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Janet UbidoDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Bernadine FarrellDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Anna ColemanDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Martie van TongerenDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research has highlighted links between occupation and risk of COVID-19 transmission and suggests that occupational risk is influenced by covariates including socio-economic status, and deprivation. This study examined the perspectives of local authority teams of how changes in policy and advice, as set out in the UK government report 'Living with COVID,' affected COVID-19 transmission risk, response and resilience in workplace settings in Greater Manchester, an area that was disproportionately affected by the pandemic.

methodsThe project, which took place between August and November 2022, undertook a mixed methods approach to incorporate wide-ranging reflections of changes following the publication of 'Living with COVID'. Quantitative data was collected from local employers (n = 149) and employees (n = 397) using online surveys, and qualitative interview data was collected from Greater Manchester local authority teams (n = 19).

resultsThe research highlighted the inequitable impact of the pandemic on those already experiencing health inequalities, including people on more precarious employment contracts or those who were unable to work from home during the pandemic. The study found that the facilitators that helped local authorities to support employers to manage transmission included clear, detailed and timely national and local guidance, good communication, partnership working, funding, and timely access to data. Barriers to supporting employers included contradictory or confusing national guidance, structural inequalities, lack of funding, and delayed access to data. Interview participants reported that they were now utilising lessons learnt during the pandemic, along with the that partnerships developed, in order to tackle wider health issues and to prepare for future pandemics or health crises.

conclusionThe findings of the study, which concur with previously published research conducted as part of the PROTECT project, highlight the importance of active reflection on the lessons learned during the course of the pandemic. The study draws on PH and EH teams' perspectives of managing COVID-19 transmission, in an area that was disproportionately affected by the pandemic, in order to add to our understanding of the best ways to ensure preparedness for future pandemics or health crises at a national level.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsResilience, PsychologicalWorkplaceAdultFemaleHealth PolicyHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational HealthQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomCOVID-19EmployeesEmployersEmploymentLocal authoritiesMitigating strategiesResilience

Identifiers

PMID39425071
PMCPMC11488279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.