ArticleBMC cancer2024
Detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with lung cancer using a rare cell sorter: a pilot study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating Tumor Cells for the Monitoring of Lung Cancer Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Liquid biopsy - a narrative review with an update on current US governmental clinical trials targeting immunotherapy.Future science OA · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe developed a Rare Cell Sorter (RCS) for collecting single cell including circulating tumor cells (CTCs). This single-institution pilot study evaluated the ability of this device to detect tumor-like cells in patients with lung cancer and confirmed their genuineness based on the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation concordance with tissue samples.
methodsThis study included patients treated for lung cancer from September 2021 to August 2022 in University of Tsukuba Hospital. Peripheral blood samples were obtained before surgery or during periodic medical checks for patients treated with drugs. We used the RCS to capture cells based on size. The cells were stained, and the Hoechst-positive, CD45-negative, and epithelial celladhesion molecule (EpCAM)- positive cells were defined as CTCs, were collected. The presumptive CTCs were counted and tested using digital droplet polymerase chain reaction for EGFR mutations and compared with the tissue EGFR status to check concordance.
resultsEighteen patients were included in this study and CTCs were detected in 6 patients (33%). The CTCs from three patients showed EGFR mutation, and the EGFR mutation status of CTCs concorded with that of tissue samples in 83% of the cases (5/6). Only one CTC showed a different status from the tissue, and the concordance rate of EGFR status between CTCs and the tissue was 96% (24/25).
conclusionThe ability of the RCS to detect CTCs in patients with lung cancer was demonstrated based on the concordance of EGFR status in this pilot study. This novel hybrid method of CTC recovery using the RCS has the potential to recover a wide range of CTCs regardless of EpCAM. Further validation through a large-scale study is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.