ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2024
A higher peak heart rate during head-up tilt test predicts the therapeutic efficacy of metoprolol in vasovagal syncope.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough beta blockers, such as metoprolol, have been widely used in the management of vasovagal syncope (VVS), their efficacy remains debated, with larger studies showing limited benefit. Identifying patient-specific characteristics that predict a positive response to metoprolol could optimize its use. This study aims to investigate the key factors that may determine which VVS patients are suitable candidates for metoprolol treatment.
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted at a single center. Patients diagnosed with VVS and treated with metoprolol for a minimum of three months were included. A 50% reduction in syncope symptom score (SS) after three months of metoprolol treatment was used to define metoprolol responders, while those who did not achieve this reduction were classified as non-responders. After a three-month follow-up, patients were divided into two groups: responders and non-responders. Baseline data-including age, gender, comorbidities, laboratory tests, and the type of VVS-were analyzed for each patient. Changes in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure during the head-up tilt test (HUTT) were also evaluated between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential predictors of metoprolol response, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the value of these predictors in selecting potential responders.
resultsA total of 168 VVS patients were enrolled between January 2016 and December 2020. Of these, 100 patients responded positively to metoprolol, while 68 did not. No significant differences in baseline characteristics or HUTT results were observed between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, responders exhibited a significantly higher peak HR compared to non-responders during the HUTT (120.13 ± 19.33 vs. 106.60 ± 22.32, p < 0.001). The increase in HR was also more pronounced in responders (0.60 ± 0.23 vs. 0.41 ± 0.25, p < 0.001). Additionally, HR variability was significantly greater in responders than in non-responders (16.18 ± 5.51 vs. 12.61 ± 5.50, p < 0.001).
conclusionHigher peak HR, larger increases in HR, and greater HR variability during the HUTT may serve as reliable predictors of a positive response to metoprolol in patients with VVS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.