Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39425037›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2024

Prehospital management and outcomes of patients calling with chest pain as the main complaint.

Sughra Ahmed, Filip Gnesin, Helle Collatz Christensen, Stig Nikolaj Blomberg, Fredrik Folke, Kristian Kragholm, Henrik Bøggild, Freddy Lippert, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Amalie Lykkemark Møller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sughra AhmedDepartment of Cardiology, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, Hillerød, 3400, Denmark. sughra.ahmed.04@gmail.com.
Filip GnesinDepartment of Cardiology, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, Hillerød, 3400, Denmark.
Helle Collatz ChristensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, Copenhagen, 2200, Denmark.
Stig Nikolaj BlombergDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, Copenhagen, 2200, Denmark.
Fredrik FolkeCopenhagen Emergency Medical Services, Telegrafvej 5, Ballerup, 2750, Denmark.
Kristian KragholmDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, Aalborg, 9000, Denmark.
Henrik BøggildPublic Health and Epidemiology, Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup, 9260, Denmark.
Freddy LippertCopenhagen Emergency Medical Services, Telegrafvej 5, Ballerup, 2750, Denmark.
Christian Torp-PedersenDepartment of Cardiology, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, Hillerød, 3400, Denmark.
Amalie Lykkemark MøllerDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen, 1353, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChest pain is a frequent cause of health care contacts. We examined the prehospital management, in-hospital discharge diagnoses, and mortality of patients calling a non-emergency and emergency medical service with chest pain.

methodsThe Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services (EMS) consists of a non-emergency medical helpline (calls to 1813) and emergency medical service (1-1-2 calls). We included all calls to the Copenhagen EMS with a primary complaint of chest pain from 2014 to 2018 in Copenhagen, Denmark. The outcomes were: emergency response (ambulance dispatch, other transports/self-transport/home visits, self-care, and unknown/cancelled response), in-hospital diagnosis within 7 days after the call (cardiovascular, pulmonary, or other non-cardiovascular/pulmonary) and 30-day mortality.

resultsAmong 4,834,071 calls, 91,671 were registered with chest pain at the Copenhagen EMS. The first call for each patient was kept for analysis (n = 66,762). In total, 91.4% were referred to the hospital, 75.8% (n = 50,627) received an ambulance and 15.6% (n = 10,383) received other transport/self-transport/home visits. Overall, 26.9% (n = 17,937) were diagnosed with a cardiovascular disease, 5.2% (n = 3,490) a pulmonary disease, 52.8% (n = 35.242) other non-cardiovascular/pulmonary disease, and 15.1% (n = 10,093) received no diagnosis. Among ambulance-transported patients, the prevalence of cardiovascular discharge diagnoses was higher (32.1%) and fewer received no diagnosis (11.0%). Cardiovascular disease was less prevalent among patients not transported by ambulance and patients not referred to hospital at all (2-13.4%) and in patients ≤ 40 years of age (< 10%). The 30-day mortality was below 5% regardless of diagnosis (0.6-4%), and 65,704 (98.4%) were still alive 30 days later.

conclusionNearly all patients calling with chest pain were referred for treatment. Among ambulance-transported patients, around half of the patients did not have a cardiovascular/pulmonary disease. While current practices appear reasonable, improved differentiation of chest pain patients in telephone consultations could potentially both improve the treatment and management of these patients and reduce the in-hospital burden of non-acute chest pain consultations.

Indexed as

Chest painEmergency medical servicesIschemic heart disease

Identifiers

PMID39425037
PMCPMC11487892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.