Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39425021›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

General practitioners' views on inappropriate prescribing for older patients: a qualitative study through focus groups.

Libert Gaël, Kacenelenbogen Nadine, De Breucker Sandra, Bensliman Rachida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Libert GaëlFaculty of Medicine, Route de Lennik, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Primary Care Research Unit, Anderlecht, CP, 808, Belgium. dr.libert.g@gmail.com.
Kacenelenbogen Nadine *Faculty of Medicine, Route de Lennik, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Primary Care Research Unit, Anderlecht, CP, 808, Belgium.
De Breucker SandraRoute de Lennik 808, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Anderlecht, 1070, Belgium.
Bensliman Rachida *Faculty of Medicine, Route de Lennik, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Primary Care Research Unit, Anderlecht, CP, 808, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInappropriate prescribing (IP) is a common problem in the older population. Despite numerous attempts to tackle this issue, it remains a public health concern. In most European countries, general practitioners (GPs) are responsible for global primary care and are thus gatekeepers for the adequacy of medicines, specifically for older people. An in-depth analysis of the situation is necessary to understand why this phenomenon is still prevalent and to identify solutions that could help avoid IP in primary practice.

methodA qualitative study based on five focus groups (FG) comprising nine to thirteen general practitioners was conducted in the French-speaking part of Belgium. Participants were recruited among the Local Medical Evaluation Groups (LMEG) and selected to guarantee heterogeneity in working organisations, years of professional experience, gender and age. All interviews were recorded with prior agreement and transcribed in verbatims. The transcripts were coded and analysed to highlight the primary themes, considering dominant and marginal discourses.

resultsFifty four GPs participated in the study, with an average experience of 30 years. IPs are perceived as a significant problem in the older population, leading to dangerous health situations. The issue is associated with polypharmacy and multimorbidity, and GPs stated to manage IP using their clinical experience. Most of the study participants faced difficulties managing IP, mostly due to the specificity and complexity of elderly care. Indeed, managing an older patient is challenging due to medical complexity, poor adherence to drug regimes, or low medical literacy. In addition, the medical environment of general practice is challenging, with multiple providers, lack of time, prescribing routine and the absence of effective communication with specialists or other care providers. Additionally, the tools and support available to help medication management in primary care are inadequate. Enhancing collaboration with pharmacists is perceived as a strong potential facilitator.

conclusionThis article addresses the complex management of IP in the old age, from the point of view of GPs. Interesting clues were highlighted, like the need to clarify roles of healthcare providers, the better fit of tools to facilitate medication's review with particularities of GPs needs and the empowerment of pharmacist collaboration.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsGeneral PractitionersInappropriate PrescribingQualitative ResearchAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelBelgiumFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolypharmacyPractice Patterns, Physicians'General medicineInappropriate prescribingOlder patientsPolypharmacyQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID39425021
PMCPMC11492209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.