ReviewBMC medical imaging2024
Segmentation of choroidal area in optical coherence tomography images using a transfer learning-based conventional neural network: a focus on diabetic retinopathy and a literature review.
Review in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of DeepLabv3+with Squeeze-and-Excitation (DeepLabv3+SE) architectures for segmenting the choroid in optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of patients with diabetic retinopathy.
methodsA total of 300 B-scans were selected from 21 patients with mild to moderate diabetic retinopathy. Six DeepLabv3+SE variants, each utilizing a different pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) for feature extraction, were compared. Segmentation performance was assessed using the Jaccard index, Dice score (DSC), precision, recall, and F1-score. Binarization and Bland-Altman analysis were employed to evaluate the agreement between automated and manual measurements of choroidal area, luminal area (LA), and Choroidal Vascularity Index (CVI).
resultsDeepLabv3+SE with EfficientNetB0 achieved the highest segmentation performance, with a Jaccard index of 95.47, DSC of 98.29, precision of 98.80, recall of 97.41, and F1-score of 98.10 on the validation set. Bland-Altman analysis indicated good agreement between automated and manual measurements of LA and CVI.
conclusionsDeepLabv3+SE with EfficientNetB0 demonstrates promise for accurate choroid segmentation in OCT images. This approach offers a potential solution for automated CVI calculation in diabetic retinopathy patients. Further evaluation of the proposed method on a larger and more diverse dataset can strengthen its generalizability and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.