Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39424976›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Evaluating and optimizing NBR-modified bituminous mixes: a rheological and RSM-based study.

Inamullah Khan, Zahoor Ahmad Khan, Muhammad Imran Khan, Mujahid Ali, Nasir Khan, Manidurai Paulraj, Siva Avudaiappan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Inamullah KhanTransportation Engineering Department, National Institute of Transportation, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan. inamullah.khan@nit.nust.edu.pk.
Zahoor Ahmad KhanDepartment of Transportation & Geotechnical Engineering, National Institute of Transportation, MCE, National University of Sciences and Technology, Risalpur, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Muhammad Imran KhanDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, 11432, Saudi Arabia.
Mujahid AliDepartment of Transport System, Traffic Engineering and Logistics, Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Kranskiego 8, Katowice, 40-019, Poland. mali@polsl.pl.
Nasir KhanDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), Seri Iskandar, 32610, Malaysia.
Manidurai PaulrajDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, University of Concepcion, P.O. Box. 160-C, Concepcion, Chile.
Siva AvudaiappanDepartment of Construction Sciences, Faculty of Construction Sciences and Territorial Planning, Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana, Dieciocho 161, Santiago, Chile. s.avudaiappan@utem.cl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bitumen shows visco-elastic behavior, exhibiting both elastic and viscous properties as predicted by dynamic response and phase angle. Modern asphalt bituminous pavements face issues such as early-stage fatigue cracks, rutting, and permanent deformations due to low-temperature cracking, high-temperature deformation, moisture susceptibility, and overloading. These pavement distresses result in the formation of potholes, alligator cracks, and various deformations, which accelerate the need for rehabilitation and maintenance. To address these concerns, this study focused on utilizing Nitrile Butadiene Rubber derived from surgical gloves as an additive in conventional asphalt pavements to assess its effect on stiffness. Nitrile Butadiene Rubber was added in intervals of 2%, 4%, 6%, and 8% to conventional bituminous pavement. The rheological properties, marshall properties, dynamic modulus, and phase angle were evaluated for varying percentages of Nitrile Butadiene Rubber at different temperature, and frequency. The dynamic response was determined using a simple performance tester at four different temperatures (4.4 °C, 21.1 °C, 37.8 °C, and 54.4 °C) and six different frequencies (0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, and 25 Hz). Response surface methodology was employed to establish a relationship between input and output variables and to optimize the amount of Nitrile Butadiene Rubber in the mix based on dynamic modulus and phase angle. The study concluded that adding up to 6% of Nitrile Butadiene Rubber improved Marshall stability, while higher percentages led to reduced stability. A similar trend was observed in the dynamic modulus, which peaked with the addition of 6% Nitrile Butadiene Rubber, regardless of frequency and temperature. The response surface methodology model indicated that coupling the percentage of Nitrile Butadiene Rubber with frequency increased the dynamic modulus at a constant temperature, with the highest value occurring at 4.4 °C. However, the dynamic modulus decreased as the temperature rose for the same combinations of Nitrile Butadiene Rubber percentages and frequencies. Numerical optimization suggested that a maximum of 5.9% Nitrile Butadiene Rubber should be added to achieve the highest dynamic modulus and lowest phase angle.

Indexed as

Dynamic Modulus |E*|Nitrile Butadiene Rubber (NBR)Phase Angle(δ)Response surface modeling (RSM)Statistical modeling

Identifiers

PMID39424976
PMCPMC11489643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.