ArticleScientific reports2024
Evaluation of water richness in coal seam roof aquifer based on factor optimization and random forest method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Water richness evaluation of coal seam roofs is a crucial prerequisite for preventing and controlling water hazards in coal seam roofs. For this purpose, Spearman correlation and GeoDetector were employed for factor optimization to investigate the significance of lithological and structural factors and the impact of interactions among different factors on the water richness of coal seam roofs. Water richness evaluation models of coal seam roofs were separately established via the entropy weight method (EWM), coefficient of variation method (CVM), and random forest method (RFM), and the predictive accuracies of these models were compared. Eleven lithological and structural factors were collected. Through Spearman correlation analysis, 6 factors were identified to have significant influences on water richness. By utilizing the interaction detection of GeoDetector, the effects of interfactor interactions on water richness were explored, and 3 combination factors were selected. AICc was used to determine the model's superiority. The evaluation results of the study area based on factor optimization and three methods were further compared and validated via pumping tests, workface water inflow tests, and three-dimensional high-density electrical method. The results indicated that the RFM exhibited higher prediction accuracy than did the entropy weight and coefficient of variation methods. Additionally, within each method, factor optimization led to improved model accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.