ArticleScientific reports2024
Computed tomography for the detection of myocardial hypoperfusion in acute myocardial infarction and the associated CT-to-catheter time.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidental Diagnosis of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction on Computed Tomography in a Burn Patient: A Case Report.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Acute Left Anterior Descending Occlusion Myocardial Infarction Incidentally Found on Surveillance Computed Tomography.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Left Atrial Strain: State of the Art and Clinical Implications.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency computed tomography (CT) often does not allow for comprehensive coronary artery assessment. However, CT may reveal pathological myocardial hypoperfusion suggestive of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), especially in patients presenting with a different diagnostic hypothesis. CT hypoperfusion is known to be associated with myocardial infarction, however the diagnostic value of CT hypoperfusion for the detection of AMI is still not well evaluated. This was a single-centre retrospective study including patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) due to suspected AMI based on incidental perfusion defects upon emergency CT imaging between 2018 and 2023. A total of 22 patients (mean age 66.3 ± 10.8 years, 11 female) were included in this analysis. The diagnosis of AMI was established in all cases leading to ICA. Culprit coronary artery lesions with an indication of percutaneous coronary intervention were detected in all patients who underwent ICA. Spearmann correlation for hypoperfused segments on CT imaging and the corresponding vascular territory upon ICA was significantly substantial (ρ = 0.73, p = < 0.001). The higher the number of affected myocardial segments, the faster ICA was initiated. Mean time between the suspicion of AMI on CT imaging and ICA was 196 (29-4044) minutes. Myocardial hypoperfusion on emergency CT imaging should be considered as AMI until proven otherwise, independent of the clinical scenario leading to performance of CT imaging and whether imaging was performed for the exclusion of non-cardiac pathologies. Early initiation of further diagnostic workup may potentially avoid delays to invasive treatment and reduce the CT-to-catheter-time. Our study explicitly underlines that myocardial hypoperfusion upon contrast enhanced CT imaging needs to be considered as sign of acute myocardial infarction and indicates targeted clinical workup to rule out this diagnosis and to shorten the timeframe from imaging diagnosis to interventional treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.