ArticleScientific reports2024
Empirical assessment of the enrichment-based metagenomic methods in identifying diverse respiratory pathogens.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Empowering One Health with metagenomics.One health outlook · 2026Review
- Spatial-quantitative profiling of intrahepatic HBsAg heterogeneity and clustered distribution in chronic HBV infection.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Article
- A case report of rapid diagnosis ofFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Probe-based nucleic acid enrichment represents an effective route to enhance the detection capacity of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in a set of clinically diverse and relevant microbial species. In this study, we assessed the effect of the enrichment-based sequencing on identifying respiratory infections using tiling RNA probes targeting 76 respiratory pathogens and sequenced using both Illumina and Oxford Nanopore platforms. Forty respiratory swab samples pre-tested for a panel of respiratory pathogens by qPCR were used to benchmark the sequencing data. We observed a general improvement in sensitivity after enrichment. The overall detection rate increased from 73 to 85% after probe capture detected by Illumina. Moreover, enrichment with probe sets boosted the frequency of unique pathogen reads by 34.6 and 37.8-fold for Illumina DNA and cDNA sequencing, respectively. This also resulted in significant improvements on genome coverage especially in viruses. Despite these advantages, we found that library pooling may cause reads mis-assignment, probably due to crosstalk issues arise from post-capture PCR and from pooled sequencing, thus increasing the risk of bleed-through signal. Taken together, an overall improvement in the breadth and depth of pathogen coverage is achieved using enrichment-based sequencing method. For future applications, automated library processing and pooling-free sequencing could enhance the precision and timeliness of probe enrichment-based clinical metagenomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.