ArticleScientific reports2024
Influence of vortex vein engorgement for photodynamic therapy in central serous chorioretinopathy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in treating central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) based on the number of engorged vortex vein draining macula visualized on ultra-widefield (UWF) indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). Thirty-six eyes of 36 patients with treatment-naïve CSC were included. Macula-draining vortex veins were assessed in each quadrant using UWF ICGA. The resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF), pigment epithelial detachment (PED), ellipsoid zone (EZ) disintegrity, and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) irregularity were evaluated at 3 months after PDT. Visual and anatomical improvements were monitored for 12 months. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with poor visual outcomes. A higher number of macula-draining vortex vein was associated to persistent SRF (p = 0.004), PED (p = 0.001), EZ disintegrity (p = 0.011), and RPE irregularity (p = 0.001). Macula-draining vortex veins were also correlated with poor EZ restoration and limited best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvements. In multivariate analysis, the number of macula-draining vortex vein (B = 0.197, p = 0.047) was a risk factor for worse BCVA at 12 months. Increased macula-draining vortex vein was related with unfavorable anatomical and poor visual outcomes after PDT in CSC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.