Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39424851›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Ensembling methods for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.

Jiffriya Mohamed Abdul Cader, M A Hakim Newton, Julia Rahman, Akmal Jahan Mohamed Abdul Cader, Abdul Sattar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Human Omnibus of Targetable Pockets.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiffriya Mohamed Abdul CaderSchool of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Australia. jiffriya.cader@griffithuni.edu.au.
M A Hakim NewtonInstitute for Integrated and Intelligent Systems (IIIS), Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Australia.
Julia RahmanSchool of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Australia.
Akmal Jahan Mohamed Abdul CaderDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Applied Sciences, South Eastern University of Sri Lanka, Sammanthurai, Sri Lanka.
Abdul SattarSchool of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council Grant DP180102727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-ligand binding affinity prediction is a key element of computer-aided drug discovery. Most of the existing deep learning methods for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction utilize single models and suffer from low accuracy and generalization capability. In this paper, we train 13 deep learning models from combinations of 5 input features. Then, we explore all possible ensembles of the trained models to find the best ensembles. Our deep learning models use cross-attention and self-attention layers to extract short and long-range interactions. Our method is named Ensemble Binding Affinity (EBA). EBA extracts information from various models using different combinations of input features, such as simple 1D sequential and structural features of the protein-ligand complexes rather than 3D complex features. EBA is implemented to accurately predict the binding affinity of a protein-ligand complex. One of our ensembles achieves the highest Pearson correlation coefficient (R) value of 0.914 and the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) value of 0.957 on the well-known benchmark test set CASF2016. Our ensembles show significant improvements of more than 15% in R-value and 19% in RMSE on both well-known benchmark CSAR-HiQ test sets over the second-best predictor named CAPLA. Furthermore, the superior performance of the ensembles across all metrics compared to existing state-of-the-art protein-ligand binding affinity prediction methods on all five benchmark test datasets demonstrates the effectiveness and robustness of our approach. Therefore, our approach to improving binding affinity prediction between proteins and ligands can contribute to improving the success rate of potential drugs and accelerate the drug development process.

Indexed as

Deep LearningProtein BindingProteinsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinDrug DiscoveryLigandsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID39424851
PMCPMC11489440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.