Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39424840›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Selection of induction chemotherapy cycles for stage N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on pre-treatment plasma EBV DNA.

Youliang Weng, Sunqin Cai, Chao Li, Yun Xu, Yuhui Pan, Zongwei Huang, Ying Li, Zijie Wu, Yu Chen, Sufang Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prognostic Analysis of Patients With N1 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma With Different Lymph Node Characteristics.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Youliang Weng *Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Sunqin Cai *Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Chao LiDepartment of Oncology, Second Hospital of Sanming City, Sanming, China.
Yun XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yuhui PanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Zongwei HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Ying LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Zijie WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yu ChenThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China. dr_cai5522@163.com.
Sufang QiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China. sufangqiu@fjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

High-level Talent Training Program of Fujian Cancer Hospital 2022YNG07Joint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology, Fujian province 2021Y9196Major Research Projects for Young and Middle-aged Researchers of Fujian Provincial Health Commission 2021ZQNZD010National Clinical Key Specialty Construction Program 2021National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072986Natural Science Foundation of Fujian province 2023J01121763Science and Technology Pilot Program of Fujian Province, China 2021Y0053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the selection of induction chemotherapy (IC) cycles for stage N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We employed propensity score matching (PSM) to categorize patients into 3-cycle and 4-cycle IC groups (IC = 3 and IC = 4). The log-rank and chi-squared tests were used respectively to evaluate the differences in survival and acute toxicities. Survival outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) were evaluated among the two groups. After PSM, each group comprised 99 patients. The IC = 4 group exhibited markedly improved survival outcomes compared with the IC = 3 group. Multivariate analysis revealed that pre-EBV DNA was an independent risk factor affecting PFS and DMFS. For high-risk patients with pre-EBV DNA ≥ 7800 copies/ml, the IC = 4 group demonstrated greater survival compared to the IC = 3 group. Among low-risk patients with pre-EBV DNA < 7800 copies/ml, both groups showed comparable survival outcomes. In terms of acute adverse reactions, the IC = 4 group experienced higher incidences, particularly with grade 2-4 alanine transaminase elevation and thrombocytopenia. For stage N3 NPC, pre-EBV DNA could be a powerful predictor for guiding the selection of IC cycles. The IC = 4 regimen is probably more beneficial to high-risk patients due to superior survival, while for low-risk patients, the IC = 3 regimen may be sufficient.

Indexed as

DNA, ViralHerpesvirus 4, HumanInduction ChemotherapyNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingDNA, ViralChemotherapy cycleInduction chemotherapyNasopharyngeal carcinomaPre-treatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA

Identifiers

PMID39424840
PMCPMC11489564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.