ArticleScientific reports2024
Selection of induction chemotherapy cycles for stage N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on pre-treatment plasma EBV DNA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Analysis of Patients With N1 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma With Different Lymph Node Characteristics.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026Article
- Incorporating early cfEBV DNA clearance into clinical risk stratification to tailor induction chemotherapy cycles for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Hip metastasis presenting as anterior knee pain from nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A case report.Oncology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the selection of induction chemotherapy (IC) cycles for stage N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We employed propensity score matching (PSM) to categorize patients into 3-cycle and 4-cycle IC groups (IC = 3 and IC = 4). The log-rank and chi-squared tests were used respectively to evaluate the differences in survival and acute toxicities. Survival outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) were evaluated among the two groups. After PSM, each group comprised 99 patients. The IC = 4 group exhibited markedly improved survival outcomes compared with the IC = 3 group. Multivariate analysis revealed that pre-EBV DNA was an independent risk factor affecting PFS and DMFS. For high-risk patients with pre-EBV DNA ≥ 7800 copies/ml, the IC = 4 group demonstrated greater survival compared to the IC = 3 group. Among low-risk patients with pre-EBV DNA < 7800 copies/ml, both groups showed comparable survival outcomes. In terms of acute adverse reactions, the IC = 4 group experienced higher incidences, particularly with grade 2-4 alanine transaminase elevation and thrombocytopenia. For stage N3 NPC, pre-EBV DNA could be a powerful predictor for guiding the selection of IC cycles. The IC = 4 regimen is probably more beneficial to high-risk patients due to superior survival, while for low-risk patients, the IC = 3 regimen may be sufficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.