ArticleScientific reports2024
Reaching and stepping respond differently to medication and cueing in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- L-Dopa Comparably Improves Gait and Limb Movements in Parkinson's Disease: A Wearable Sensor Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The basal ganglia contribute to internal timekeeping, and dopaminergic medication has been observed to moderate timing deficits associated with Parkinson's Disease (PD) during single joint movements. However, it is unclear whether similar effects can be observed in multi-joint movements. Twenty-five people with PD and twelve healthy peers performed repetitive reaching and stepping-in-place tasks with and without auditory cues at their self-selected maximal cadence. The PD group was measured ON and OFF medication. Reduced cadence error was found for both groups and tasks when cued, and ON PD exhibited decreased cadence compared to OFF PD. Overall timing variability was no different from controls, but differences were found in estimates of clock and motor variance using the Wing-Kristofferson model of interval timing. A medication and cueing interaction during the reaching task produced increased clock variance in uncued, ON PD. During the stepping task, clock and motor variance of the PD group were unaffected by cues, in contrast to the control group. Serial lag-one correlation was reduced in both groups for cued reaching, but was unaffected by cueing or medication in the PD group when stepping-in-place. These findings suggest that overall timing variability may not capture timing deficits in PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.