ArticleScientific reports2024
Using machine learning for the assessment of ecological status of unmonitored waters in Poland.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal assessment of ecological quality and driving mechanisms in the Beijing metropolitan area.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology allow for development of new tools for analytics and management which present new opportunities in field of environmental protection. The following study showcases usage of Machine Learning (ML) techniques as a complementary method for water status assessment of water bodies. Since the main goal of Water Framework Directive (WFD) is to improve the quality of water and reach good status in all the water bodies across Europe intensive monitoring program was launched together with water status assessment procedure. Based on requirements of the European Union's WFD concerning ecological status assessment it is presented how ML can be used for assessment of Polish unmonitored river water bodies. Due to the absence of monitoring data, the foremost challenge lay in securing relevant alternative data which was set to be anthropogenic pressures. The pivotal solution was implementation of ML techniques which enable processing of seemingly unrelated information concerning pressures in the catchment. Decision Tree, Random Forest, KNN, Support Vector Machine, Multinomial Naive Bayes, XGBoost models have been tested and the results indicated most suitable techniques. Study shows highest efficiency of XGBoost and Random Forest algorithms for classification of unmonitored water bodies. The models were compared by their overall accuracy (OA) reaching approximately 93% for binary classification and 72% for comprehensive classification as well as partial class accuracies and the Probability of Misclassification (PoM) parameter. The analyses demonstrates a practical application of AI in assessment of unmonitored water bodies in case of binary classification used for reporting water status objectives of WFD as well as possible usage of full classification for planning and operational uses. OA and PoM are postulated as the best measures of goodness of classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.