Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39424760›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2025

A cross-cultural comparison of intrinsic and extrinsic motivational drives for learning.

Zhaoqi Zhang, Lieke L F van Lieshout, Olympia Colizoli, Haoqian Li, Tongxi Yang, Chao Liu, Shaozheng Qin, Harold Bekkering

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Introduction to the special issue on individual differences in memory modulation.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhaoqi ZhangDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands. claire.zhang@donders.ru.nl.
Lieke L F van LieshoutDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Olympia ColizoliDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Haoqian LiState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Tongxi YangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Chao LiuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China. liuchao@bnu.edu.cn.
Shaozheng QinState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Harold BekkeringDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32130045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsic motivational drives, like the autonomous feeling of control, and extrinsic motivational drives, like monetary reward, can benefit learning. Extensive research has focused on neurobiological and psychological factors that affect these drives, but our understanding of the sociocultural factors is limited. Here, we compared the effects of autonomy and rewards on episodic recognition memory between students from Dutch and Chinese universities. In an exploratory learning task, participants viewed partially obscured objects that they needed to subsequently remember. We independently manipulated autonomy, as volitional control over an exploration trajectory, as well as the chance to receive monetary rewards. The learning task was followed by memory tests for objects and locations. For both cultural groups, we found that participants learned better in autonomous than non-autonomous conditions. However, the beneficial effect of reward on memory performance was stronger for Chinese than for Dutch participants. By incorporating the sociocultural brain perspective, we discuss how differences in norms and values between Eastern and Western cultures can be integrated with the neurocognitive framework about dorsal lateral and ventral medial prefrontal cortex and dopaminergic reward modulations on learning and memory. These findings have important implications for understanding the neurocognitive mechanisms in which both autonomy and extrinsic rewards are commonly used to motivate students in the realm of education and urge more attention to investigate cultural differences in learning.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonLearningMotivationPersonal AutonomyRecognition, PsychologyRewardAdolescentAdultChinaFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsYoung AdultAutonomyCross-cultural comparisonLearningMotivationReward

Identifiers

PMID39424760
PMCPMC11805854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.