Observational studyScientific reports2024
Alteration in cerebrospinal fluid flow based on the neurological prognosis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Variability in the circulation of cerebrospinal fluid: causes and clinical implications for intraventricular drug delivery.Frontiers in drug delivery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated alterations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow based on the neurological prognosis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. This prospective observational study was conducted from May 2023 to June 2024. Stroke distance was measured using magnetic resonance imaging flowmetry immediately and at 72 h after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), with negative values indicating caudocranial direction. The caudocranial direction of CSF flow was observed in 17 (56.7%) patients immediately after ROSC, and in 20 (66.7%) patients at 72 h after ROSC. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of caudocranial CSF flow immediately after ROSC between the groups with good and poor neurological prognosis [6 (50.0%) vs. 11 (61.1%); p = 0.55]. However, the occurrence of caudocranial CSF flow at 72 h after ROSC was significantly higher in the group with poor neurological prognosis compared to the group with good neurological prognosis [3 (25.0%) vs. 17 (94.4%); p < 0.001]. This study demonstrated that the occurrence of caudocranial CSF flow at 72 h after ROSC was significantly higher in the group with poor neurological prognosis compared to the group with good neurological prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.