ArticleScientific reports2024
Online bilateral matching methodology for anti-epidemic resources based on spatial transmission risk.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper focuses on the online anti-epidemic resource allocation between demanders and suppliers considering the epidemic spatial spread. The spatial crowdsourcing with sharing platform is an effective way for anti-epidemic resource allocation, and a reasonable online matching strategy can improve the efficiency of resource utilization. The paper proposes online matching heuristic strategy (HSTRF-LRLUF strategy) and designs an online batch bilateral matching algorithm for anti-epidemic resources, which considers the impact of grid spatial aggregation and diffusion risk of emerging infectious diseases. The population distribution within grids and the commuting patterns between grids can provide decision support for selecting online matching strategies of anti-epidemic resources. A larger matching time window focusing on the spatial transmission risk (TR) of the epidemic can obtain better matching results. However, with a smaller matching time window, the decision makers can focus on spatial agglomeration risk (OR) or spatial diffusion risk (IR). The paper effectively combines the spatial crowdsourcing model with the anti-epidemic resource allocation to achieve the allocation of emergency resources to individuals. A combined anti-epidemic resource online matching heuristic strategies is designed from the spatial agglomeration risk and the spatial diffusion risk. Decision makers can dynamically adjust the online matching strategies of anti-epidemic resources by evaluating the spatial agglomeration risk, the spatial diffusion risk, and the overall spatial transmission risk based on the real-time spread of the epidemic and the supply of anti-epidemic resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.