Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39424609›Full record

ArticleAging cell2024

RETRACTION: 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D exerts an antiaging role by activation of Nrf2-antioxidant signaling and inactivation of p16/p53-senescence signaling.

Abstract readRetraction Notice
In one paragraph

Article in Aging cell, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

0 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

retractionChen, L., Yang, R., Qiao, W., Zhang, W., Chen, J., Mao, L., Goltzman, D., Miao, D. (2019). 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D exerts an antiaging role by activation of Nrf2-antioxidant signaling and inactivation of p16/p53-senescence signaling. Aging Cell, 18(3), e12951. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12951 The above article, published online on 24 March 2019 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between; the journal Editor-in-Chief, Monty Montano; The Anatomical Society; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The retraction has been agreed due to duplications observed between elements of Figures 1h and 1j; 5d and 5f; 3a and 6j; and Supplemental Figures 4c and 4e. The authors acknowledged their errors in figure management, which led to the duplications observed between Figures 3a and 6j, as well as between S4c and S4e. They also admitted to copying and pasting small areas from figure S4e into the same image for aesthetic purposes. Additionally, they admitted to editing Figure 4d (ChIP gel image) to reduce noise and enhance the clarity of the bands shown. The authors provided some data and an explanation for the similarities observed between Figures 1h and 1j; and Figures 5d and 5f. However, their explanation was not sufficient. Due to the extent of the identified issues, the editors have lost confidence in the data presented. The authors disagree with the retraction.

Identifiers

PMID39424609
PMCPMC11561704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.