Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39424560›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Neurology2024

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fasudil in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ROCK-ALS): a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Jan C Koch, Andreas Leha, Helen Bidner, Isabell Cordts, Johannes Dorst, René Günther, Daniel Zeller, Nathalie Braun, Moritz Metelmann, Philippe Corcia and 24 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03792490 (Inhibition of Rho Kinase), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03792490 phase2completednot on this map

Inhibition of Rho Kinase (ROCK) With Fasudil as Disease-modifying Treatment for ALS

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GoettingenRan2019 to 2023Enrolled120ConditionsAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisArmsFasudil, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Discovery ofACS bio & med chem Au · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Jan C KochDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Andreas LehaDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Helen BidnerMünchner Studienzentrum, Technical University Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany.
Isabell CordtsDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany.
Johannes DorstDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
René GüntherDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany; German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Daniel ZellerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Nathalie BraunNeuromuscular Diseases Unit/ALS Clinic, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.
Moritz MetelmannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Philippe CorciaCentre de Référence Maladie Rare (CRMR) SLA et les Autres Maladies du Neurone Moteur (FILSLAN), Tours, France; Faculté de Médecine, INSERM U1253, "iBrain Imaging Brain and Neuropsychiatry" Université François-Rabelais de Tours, Tours, France.
Elisa De La CruzALS centre, CHU Gui de Chauliac, Univ Montpellier, INM, INSERM, Montpellier, France.
Patrick WeydtDepartment for Neuromuscular Disorders, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Thomas MeyerDepartment of Neurology, Center for ALS and Other Motor Neuron Disorders, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Julian GroßkreutzDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; Precision Neurology of Neuromuscular and Motoneuron Diseases, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Marie-Hélène SorianiALS Reference Centre, Pasteur 2 Hospital, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, UMR2CA, Nice, France.
Shahram AttarianNeuromuscular Disease and ALS Reference Center, Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, CHU Timone, Marseille, France.
Jochen H WeishauptDivision for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Neurology Department, Mannheim Center for Translational Medicine, University Medicine Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Ute WeyenDepartment of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, BG-Kliniken Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany.
Josua KuttlerDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Gabriela ZurekMVZ Medizinisches Labor Bremen GmbH, Bremen, Germany.
Mary-Louise RogersMND&NR Lab, FHMRI, College of Medicine and Public health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Emily FenebergDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany.
Marcus DeschauerDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany.
Christoph NeuwirthNeuromuscular Diseases Unit/ALS Clinic, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.
Joanne WuuDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Albert C LudolphDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Jens SchmidtDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Department of Neurology and Pain Treatment, Neuromuscular Center, Center for Translational Medicine, Immanuel University Hospital Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Yvonne RemaneCentral Pharmacy, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
William CamuALS centre, CHU Gui de Chauliac, Univ Montpellier, INM, INSERM, Montpellier, France.
Tim FriedeDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Michael BenatarDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Markus WeberNeuromuscular Diseases Unit/ALS Clinic, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.
Paul LingorDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Munich, Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany. Electronic address: paul.lingor@tum.de.
ROCK-ALS Study group

Funding

Uncovering new genes and disease modifiers for ALS and related disordersU54NS092091 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Marka Van Blitterswijk · 2014 to 2026
$19.8M
NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS092091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFasudil is a small molecule inhibitor of Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) and is approved for the treatment of subarachnoid haemorrhage. In preclinical studies, fasudil has been shown to attenuate neurodegeneration, modulate neuroinflammation, and foster axonal regeneration. We aimed to investigate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fasudil in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

methodsROCK-ALS was a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 19 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis centres in Germany, France, and Switzerland. Individuals (aged 18-80 years) with at least probable amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (as per the revised El Escorial criteria), a disease duration of 6-24 months, and a slow vital capacity greater than 65% of predicted normal were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 30 mg (15 mg twice daily) or 60 mg (30 mg twice daily) fasudil or matched placebo intravenously for 20 days over a 4-week period. Follow-up assessments were performed at 45, 90, and 180 days after treatment initiation. The co-primary endpoints were safety until day 180 (defined as the proportion without drug-related serious adverse events) and tolerability during the treatment period (defined as the proportion who did not discontinue treatment due to suspected drug-related adverse events). The primary analyses were carried out in the intention-to-treat population, which included all participants who entered the treatment phase. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03792490) and Eudra-CT (2017-003676-31) and is now completed.

findingsBetween Feb 20, 2019, and April 20, 2022, 120 participants were enrolled and randomised; two individuals assigned fasudil 30 mg withdrew consent before the baseline visit. Thus, the intention-to-treat population comprised 35 in the fasudil 30 mg group, 39 in the fasudil 60 mg group, and 44 in the placebo group. The estimated proportion without a drug-related serious adverse event was 1·00 (95% CI 0·91 to 1·00) with placebo, 1·00 (0·89 to 1·00) with fasudil 30 mg, and 1·00 (0·90 to 1·00) with fasudil 60 mg; the difference in proportions was 0·00 (95% CI -0·11 to 0·10; p>0·99) for fasudil 30 mg versus placebo and 0·00 (-0·10 to 0·10; p>0·99) for fasudil 60 mg versus placebo. Treatment tolerability (the estimated proportion who did not discontinue) was 0·93 (95% CI 0·81 to 0·99) with placebo, 1·00 (0·90 to 1·00) with fasudil 30 mg, and 0·90 (0·76 to 0·97) with fasudil 60 mg; the difference in proportions was 0·07 (95% CI -0·05 to 0·20; p=0·25) for fasudil 30 mg versus placebo, and -0·03 (-0·18 to 0·10; p=0·70) for fasudil 60 mg versus placebo. Eight deaths occurred: two in the placebo group, four in the fasudil 30 mg group, and two in the fasudil 60 mg group. The most common serious adverse events were respiratory failure (seven events), gastrostomy (five events), pneumonia (four events), and dysphagia (four events). No serious adverse events or deaths were attributed to study treatment. Adverse events, which were mainly related to disease progression, occurred in 139 participants in the placebo group, 108 in the fasudil 30 mg group, and 105 in the fasudil 60 mg group.

interpretationFasudil was well tolerated and safe in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The effect of fasudil on efficacy outcomes should be explored in larger clinical trials with a longer treatment duration, oral administration, and potentially higher dose of the trial drug.

fundingFramework of the E-Rare Joint Transnational Call 2016 "Clinical research for new therapeutic uses of already existing molecules (repurposing) in rare diseases".

Indexed as

1-(5-Isoquinolinesulfonyl)-2-MethylpiperazineAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisProtein Kinase Inhibitorsrho-Associated KinasesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult1-(5-Isoquinolinesulfonyl)-2-MethylpiperazinefasudilProtein Kinase Inhibitorsrho-Associated Kinases

Identifiers

PMID39424560
PMCPMC12741558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.