Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39424526›Full record

ReviewDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2024

Current approaches to produce durable biomaterials: Trends in polymeric materials for restorative dentistry applications.

Carmem S Pfeifer, Fernanda S Lucena, Matthew G Logan, Devatha Nair, Steven H Lewis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carmem S PfeiferOregon Health & Science University, School of Dentistry, Division of Biomaterial and Biomedical Sciences, 2730 S Moody Ave., Portland, OR 97201, USA. Electronic address: pfeiferc@ohsu.edu.
Fernanda S LucenaOregon Health & Science University, School of Dentistry, Division of Biomaterial and Biomedical Sciences, 2730 S Moody Ave., Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Matthew G LoganOregon Health & Science University, School of Dentistry, Division of Biomaterial and Biomedical Sciences, 2730 S Moody Ave., Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Devatha NairUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, School of Dental Medicine, Department of Craniofacial Biology, 17500 E 19th Ave, Aurora, CO 80014, USA.
Steven H LewisOregon Health & Science University, School of Dentistry, Division of Biomaterial and Biomedical Sciences, 2730 S Moody Ave., Portland, OR 97201, USA.

Funding

Novel polymeric materials with improved durability in the oral environment: tailoring responses to host and bacterial enzymes with anti-proteolytic and ecology-based antimicrobial approaches.R35DE029083 · NIDCR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Carmem S. Pfeifer · 2019 to 2026
$8.1M
On Demand Removal of Oral Biofilms via Photresponsive CoatingsK25DE027418 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI NAIR, DEVATHA P. · 2018 to 2022
$1.0M
PORT (Portland Oral health Research Training)R90DE031533 · NIDCR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WU, HUI · 2021 to 2025
$821k
NIDCR NIH HHS K25 DE027418NIDCR NIH HHS R35 DE029083NIDCR NIH HHS R90 DE031533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental caries continues to be a public health issue, especially more evident in underserved populations throughout the U.S. Unfortunately, especially with an aging population, hundreds of thousands of resin composite restorations are replaced each year due to recurring decay and fracture. According to several cohort studies, the average life span of this type of restoration is 10 years or less, depending on the caries risk level of the patient and the complexity of the restorative procedure. Any new material development must depart from the simple restoration of form paradigm, in which the filling is simply inert/biocompatible. This review will discuss novel antibiofilm structures, based on a targeted approach specifically against dysbiotic bacteria. Biofilm coalescence can be prevented by using glycosyl transferase - GTF inhibitors, in a non-bactericidal approach. On the tooth substrate side, MMP-inhibiting molecules can improve the stability of the collagen in the hybrid layer. This review will also discuss the importance of testing the materials in a physiologically relevant environment, mimicking the conditions in the mouth in terms of mechanical loading, bacterial challenge, and the presence of saliva. Ultimately, the goal of materials development is to achieve durable restorations, capable of adapting to the oral environment and resisting challenges that go beyond mechanical demands. That way, we can prevent the unnecessary loss of additional tooth structure that comes with every re-treatment. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: While proper restorative technique and patient education in terms of diet and oral hygiene are crucial factors in increasing the longevity of esthetic direct restorations, materials better able to resist and interact with the conditions of the oral environment are still needed. Reproducing the success of dental amalgams with esthetic materials continues to be the Holy Grail of materials development.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBiofilmsDental Restoration, PermanentComposite ResinsDental CariesDental MaterialsHumansPolymersBiocompatible MaterialsComposite ResinsDental MaterialsPolymersAcquired pellicleDental adhesivesDentin collagenOral biofilmPolymerizationResin composites

Identifiers

PMID39424526
PMCPMC11637916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.