ReviewDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2024
Current approaches to produce durable biomaterials: Trends in polymeric materials for restorative dentistry applications.
Review in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of Dentin Biomodification on the Survival of Resin Composite Restorations: An Umbrella Review.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- Digitally-driven optimization of intraoral water jet parameters for plaque removal: a personalized 3D-guided orthogonal study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Peptides as Novel Ecological Approaches to Caries Prevention.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Improvement of dentin bonding via adhesive monomers with multiple hydrogen bonding moieties.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dental caries continues to be a public health issue, especially more evident in underserved populations throughout the U.S. Unfortunately, especially with an aging population, hundreds of thousands of resin composite restorations are replaced each year due to recurring decay and fracture. According to several cohort studies, the average life span of this type of restoration is 10 years or less, depending on the caries risk level of the patient and the complexity of the restorative procedure. Any new material development must depart from the simple restoration of form paradigm, in which the filling is simply inert/biocompatible. This review will discuss novel antibiofilm structures, based on a targeted approach specifically against dysbiotic bacteria. Biofilm coalescence can be prevented by using glycosyl transferase - GTF inhibitors, in a non-bactericidal approach. On the tooth substrate side, MMP-inhibiting molecules can improve the stability of the collagen in the hybrid layer. This review will also discuss the importance of testing the materials in a physiologically relevant environment, mimicking the conditions in the mouth in terms of mechanical loading, bacterial challenge, and the presence of saliva. Ultimately, the goal of materials development is to achieve durable restorations, capable of adapting to the oral environment and resisting challenges that go beyond mechanical demands. That way, we can prevent the unnecessary loss of additional tooth structure that comes with every re-treatment. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: While proper restorative technique and patient education in terms of diet and oral hygiene are crucial factors in increasing the longevity of esthetic direct restorations, materials better able to resist and interact with the conditions of the oral environment are still needed. Reproducing the success of dental amalgams with esthetic materials continues to be the Holy Grail of materials development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.