Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39424424›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Change Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Correlates and Association With Prognosis.

Gjin Ndrepepa, Salvatore Cassese, Robert A Byrne, Blerina Bevapi, Michael Joner, Hendrik B Sager, Sebastian Kufner, Erion Xhepa, Tareq Ibrahim, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gjin NdrepepaDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8725-055X
Salvatore CasseseDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8668-4313
Robert A ByrneDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute (CVRI) Mater Private Network Dublin Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5224-6393
Blerina BevapiDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.
Michael JonerDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2971-8310
Hendrik B SagerDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0197-6553
Sebastian KufnerDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8091-4552
Erion XhepaDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0728-2819
Tareq IbrahimMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik Innere Medizin I (Kardiologie, Angiologie, Pneumologie), Klinikum rechts der Isar Technische Universität München Munich Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3321-2969
Karl-Ludwig LaugwitzGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance Munich Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4948-4846
Heribert SchunkertDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6428-3001
Adnan KastratiDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4341-891X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) change (ΔLVEF) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and the long-term mortality rate in patients with coronary artery disease is incompletely investigated. We aimed to assess the impact of PCI on LVEF and the association of ΔLVEF after PCI with the long-term mortality rate. METHODS AND

resultsThis observational study included 8181 patients with paired angiographic LVEF measurements performed at baseline and 6 to 8 months following the index PCI. ΔLVEF was defined as LVEF measured on the 6- to 8-month angiography minus LVEF measured on the baseline angiography. LVEF change was classified according to the following categories: reduced (ΔLVEF <0), mildly improved (ΔLVEF >0% to <10%) and largely improved (ΔLVEF ≥10%). The primary outcome was the 5-year mortality rate. In patients with baseline LVEF <40%, 40% to <50% and ≥50%, ΔLVEF (median [25th-75th percentiles]) was 6.0% [0.0% to 14.0%], 4.0% [-1.0% to 11.0%] and 0.0% [-4.0% to 3.0%], respectively (

conclusionsIn patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI, improvement of LVEF following PCI was associated with a reduced long-term mortality rate in patients with reduced LVEF but not in patients with preserved LVEF before intervention.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftAgedCoronary AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment Outcomecoronary artery diseasedeathleft ventricular ejection fractionpercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID39424424
PMCPMC11935702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.