ArticlePhysiological reports2024
Vaping causes an acute BMI-dependent change in pulmonary blood flow.
Article in Physiological reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction to "Vaping causes an acute BMI-dependent change in pulmonary blood flow".Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Vaping causes an acute BMI-dependent change in pulmonary blood flow.Physiological reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vaping use has skyrocketed especially among young adults, however there is no consensus on how vaping impacts the lungs. We aimed to determine whether there were changes in lung function acutely after a standard vaping session or if there were differences in lung function metrics between a healthy never-vaping cohort (N = 6; 27.3 ± 3.0 years) and a young asymptomatic vaping cohort (N = 14; 26.4 ± 8.0 years) indicating chronic changes. Pulmonary function measurements and impulse oscillometry were obtained on all participants. Oxygen-enhanced and Arterial Spin Labelling MRI were used to measure specific ventilation and perfusion, respectively, before and after vaping, and in the control cohort at baseline. MRI metrics did not show any significant differences in specific ventilation or perfusion after vaping. Heart rate increased post-vaping (68.1 ± 10.5 to 71.3 ± 8.7, p = 0.020); however, this and other metrics did not show a nicotine dose-dependent effect. There was a significant negative correlation between BMI and change in mean perfusion post-vaping (p = 0.003); those with normal/low BMI showing an increase in perfusion and vice versa for high BMI. This may be due to subjects lying supine during vaping inhalation. Pulmonary function metrics indicative of airways resistance showed significant differences between the vaping and control cohorts indicating early airway changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.