ArticleBMJ open2024
Emerging lessons from experiences at transitions in care among hospitalised patients with cancer with postdischarge frequent emergency department use: a qualitative study using linked clinical and patient-reported interview data from Quebec, Canada.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01179867 (Using Novel Canadian Resources to Improve Medication Reconciliation at Discharge), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Using Novel Canadian Resources to Improve Medication Reconciliation at Discharge
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile teamwork is essential to providing high-quality patient-centred care, challenges in interprofessional collaboration and decision-making in hospital settings are common, especially for patients with cancer. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify emerging themes and potential challenges related to hospital discharge experiences among patients hospitalised for cancer who became frequent emergency department (ED) users postdischarge.
methodsA cohort of patients with cancer discharged from an academic health centre in Montreal (Canada) between October 2014 and November 2016 was assembled. Using health administrative claims from the provincial universal healthcare programme, frequent ED (FED) users were identified as patients who had a ≥4 ED visits in the year following hospital discharge. Qualitative analysis of transcripts from semistructured telephone interviews conducted with patients 25-30 days' postdischarge was used for in-depth exploratory analyses to characterise hospital discharge experiences and transition process from the hospital to the community.
resultsOverall, 182 (14.5%) of 1253 patients with cancer who became FED users were included in this study. The mean age was 69.1 (SD=11.5), 59.9% (n=109) were male, and the most frequent cancers were 80 (43.9%) respiratory and 52 (28.6%) upper digestive cancer. Content analyses revealed six emerging themes from the FED patient interviews. Overall, these included (1) incomplete communication of information, (2) hospital discharge planning, (3) coordinating care among team members, (4) follow-up with outpatient providers, (5) monitoring and managing symptoms after discharge and (6) enlisting help of social and community supports.
conclusionsUsing integrated data from clinical, administrative claims and patient interviews, this study provided insights into the challenges related to hospital discharge experiences and transition into community among hospitalised patients with cancer with FED use. Application of our findings could assist in hospital discharge preparation and improvement in healthcare delivery and health outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01179867.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.