Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39424379›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Exploration of patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives on kidney failure risk and the use of the kidney failure risk equation in MULTIPle lOng-term condItions aNd frailTy (MULTIPOINT) study: a qualitative interview and focus group study protocol.

Heather Walker, Michael K Sullivan, Bhautesh Dinesh Jani, Patrick B Mark, Katie I Gallacher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heather WalkerSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK heather.walker.2@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0148-0766
Michael K SullivanSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3800-2330
Bhautesh Dinesh JaniGeneral Practice and Primary Care, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Patrick B MarkSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Katie I GallacherGeneral Practice and Primary Care, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8620-8758

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinical guidelines recommend the use of the kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) to guide the referral of individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) to secondary kidney care services. People living with CKD frequently experience multiple long-term conditions (multimorbidity) and/or frailty. This may impact patients' or carers' perceptions of kidney failure in the context of other health problems and associated risks and emphasises the need for shared decision-making. This paper presents the research protocol for the exploration of patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives on kidney failure risk and the use of the KFRE in the MULTIPle lOng-term condItions aNd frailTy study. This study aims to investigate patient and healthcare professionals' perspectives and expectations of the use of KFRE in individuals with CKD and multimorbidity and/or frailty, with a focus on shared decision-making. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Analysis of semistructured interviews with adults who have CKD and multimorbidity and/or frailty and focus groups with healthcare professionals (who are involved in caring for patients with CKD). Framework analysis, underpinned by normalisation process theory, will be used to develop codes and explore themes from the interviews and focus groups. Patient and public involvement has been pivotal to the study conceptualisation and will continue to be embedded throughout the study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has undergone peer review by the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Research and Innovation team and has been granted ethical approval in August 2023 by the NHS Health Research Authority following a favourable opinion from the West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee (REC) 3 (IRAS ID: 325848, REC reference: 23WS/0119, Protocol number GN22RE559).The results of the research will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conferences, as well as to patient and public involvement groups who have been involved in the study and through knowledge exchange events.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsFrailtyQualitative ResearchAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelDecision Making, SharedFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMultimorbidityMultiple Chronic ConditionsRenal InsufficiencyRenal Insufficiency, ChronicChronic DiseaseChronic renal failureFrailtyPrognosisQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39424379
PMCPMC11492959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.