ArticleBrain research2025
Delayed-and-abbreviated environmental enrichment after traumatic brain injury confers neurobehavioral benefits similar to immediate-and-continuous exposure.
Article in Brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Future Directions and Evolution Strategies for the Clinical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Bridging the gap: Acute amantadine augments the neurorehabilitative efficacy of delayed and abbreviated environmental enrichment in a pediatric traumatic brain injury model.Brain research · 2026Article
- Sound pressure levels at 40 dB and 50 dB are more suitable for acoustic-cued water maze tests.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Supportive enriched environment improves recovery from persistent motor and cognitive impairments after severe traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Environmental enrichment (EE) consists of increased living space, complex stimuli, and social interaction that collectively confer neurobehavioral benefits in preclinical models of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The typical EE approach entails implementation immediately after surgery and continual exposure, which is not clinically applicable, as TBI patients often only receive rehabilitation after critical care, and then only for a few hours per day. We are focused on developing a clinically relevant model of neurorehabilitation by refining the timing of initiation and duration of EE exposure after TBI. The goal of this experiment is to compare the typical EE approach to paradigms where EE is delayed by 3 or 7 days after TBI and then provided for only 6 h per day, which better mimics the clinic. The hypothesis is that the delayed-and-abbreviated EE paradigms will promote neurobehavioral benefits like the typical approach of immediate-and-continuous exposure. To test the hypothesis, anesthetized adult male rats underwent a controlled cortical impact of moderate severity (2.8 mm deformation at 4 m/s) or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to post-operative EE or standard (STD) housing. Motor ability, spatial learning, and memory retention were assessed. The hypothesis was confirmed as all EE-treated groups performed better than the STD group in all behavioral assessments (p < 0.05) and did not differ from one another (p > 0.05). The ability of EE to provide significant behavioral benefits even when delayed and delivered in moderation affords further support for EE as a preclinical model of neurorehabilitation and offers greater insight into the length of the therapeutic window.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.