Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39423307›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2025

Clinical and genetic landscape of optic atrophy in 826 families: insights from 50 nuclear genes.

Yuxi Zheng, Panfeng Wang, Shiqiang Li, Yuxi Long, Yi Jiang, Dongwei Guo, Xiaoyun Jia, Mengchu Liu, Yiyan Zeng, Xueshan Xiao and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Neuro-Ophthalmologic Manifestations ofJournal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yuxi ZhengState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Panfeng WangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Shiqiang LiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Yuxi LongState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Yi JiangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Dongwei GuoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Xiaoyun JiaState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Mengchu LiuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Yiyan ZengState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Xueshan XiaoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou 510060, China.
J Fielding HejtmancikOphthalmic Molecular Genetics Section, Ophthalmic Genetics and Visual Function Branch, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Qingjiong ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou 510060, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7508-848X
Wenmin SunState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou 510060, China.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds of the State Key Laboratory of OphthalmologyNational Natural Science Foundation of China 82171056Science and Technology Planning Projects of Guangzhou 202102010271Science and Technology Planning Projects of Guangzhou SL2024A03J00525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hereditary optic neuropathies (HON) comprise a group of diseases caused by genetic defects in either the mitochondrial or nuclear genomes. The increasing availability of genetic testing has expanded the genetic and phenotypic spectrum of HON more broadly than previously recognized. The genetic and phenotypic landscape of HON is attributed to 50 nuclear genes, so we genetically analysed patients with suspected HON from a group of 4776 index cases following our previous study on 1516 probands with Leber's HON (LHON) who had mitochondrial DNA variants. Exome sequencing was performed in 473 probands diagnosed with nuclear gene-related HON (nHON) and 353 cases with unsolved LHON. Sequencing and variant interpretation of the 50 nuclear genes indicated that the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing for nHON was 31.50% (149/473), while it was markedly lower [1.42% (5/353)] for LHON patients without primary mtDNA mutations. The top five genes implicated in nHON in our in-house cohort were OPA1, WFS1, FDXR, ACO2 and AFG3L2, which accounted for 82.46% of probands. Although OPA1 was the most prevalent nHON-causative gene in both our cohort (53.25%) and a literature review (37.09%), the predominance of OPA1, WFS1 and FDXR differed significantly between our in-house cohort and the literature review (P-adjusted < 0.001). Fundus changes in nHON could be stratified into three categories: the most common was optic atrophy at examination (78.79%); the rarest was LHON-like optic atrophy (3.64%); and optic atrophy with concurrent retinal degeneration (17.57%), an independent risk factor for visual prognosis in nHON, occurred at an intermediate frequency. A systematic genotype-phenotype analysis highlighted different genetic contributions for ocular, extraocular neurological and extraocular non-neurological phenotypes. In addition, systemic variant analysis at the individual gene level suggested a revised interpretation of the pathogenicity of a WFS1 heterozygous truncation variant. This study provides a panoramic view of the genetic and phenotypic profiles of HON in a real-world study and the literature. The categories of nHON fundus phenotypes will benefit future studies on the molecular mechanisms underlying HON and targeted therapies. In addition to routine ophthalmic examinations, careful examination of extraocular symptoms and meaningful genetic counselling are warranted for patients with nHON.

Indexed as

Optic Atrophies, HereditaryAdolescentAdultChildCohort StudiesExome SequencingFemaleGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedMutationOptic Atrophy, Hereditary, LeberPhenotypeYoung AdultGTP PhosphohydrolasesMembrane ProteinsOPA1 protein, humandominant optic atrophyhereditary optic neuropathyLeber’s hereditary optic neuropathymitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID39423307
PMCPMC12073998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.