ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Mapping the amplitude and phase of dissolved
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technologies and Strategies for Metabolic and Molecular Imaging With Hyperpolarized MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Review
- Combining hyperpolarizedJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2025Article
- Mapping the amplitude and phase of dissolvedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Optimizing reliability of RBC signal oscillation measures from hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess the regional amplitude and phase of dissolved
methods
resultsWith sliding window keyhole reconstruction, regional phase differences were observed in the RBC signal oscillations: mean phase = (0.27 ± 0.19) rad in healthy volunteers, (0.24 ± 0.13) rad in CTEPH patients, and (0.33 ± 0.19) rad in patients with post-COVID-19 residual lung abnormality. The oscillation amplitude and phase maps were more heterogeneous (i.e., they showed increased coefficient of variation) for the CTEPH patients. The RBC oscillation amplitude was repeatable, and the mean three-scan coefficient of variation was smaller when the phase adjustment was made (0.07 ± 0.04 compared with 0.16 ± 0.05).
conclusionSliding window keyhole reconstruction of radial dissolved
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.