ArticlePloS one2024
Action observation intervention using three-dimensional movies improves the usability of hands with distal radius fractures in daily life-A nonrandomized controlled trial in women.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveProlonged immobilization of joints after distal radius fracture (DRF) causes cerebral disuse-dependent plasticity (DDP) and deterioration of upper extremity function. Action observation therapy (AOT) can improve DDP. TRIAL
designThis nonrandomized controlled trial (UMIN 000039973) tested the hypothesis that AOT improves hand-use difficulties during activities of daily living in patients with DRF.
methodRight-handed women with volar locking plate fixation for DRF were divided into AOT and Non-AOT groups for a 12-week intervention. The primary outcome was difficulty in using the fractured hand, assessed with the Japanese version of the Patient-related Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). The secondary outcomes were range of motion (ROM) of the injured side and gap between measured ROM and patient-estimated ROM. The survey was administered immediately post operation and at postoperative weeks 4, 8, and 12. The AOT group used a head-mounted display and three-dimensional video during ROM exercises. The Non-AOT group used active ROM exercises alone. A generalized linear model (GLM) was used to confirm interactions and main effects by group and time period, and multiple comparisons were performed.
resultsThirty-five patients were assigned to the AOT group (n = 18, median age, 74 years) or the Non-AOT group (n = 17, median age, 70 years). In the GLM, PRWE Total, PRWE Specific, and PRWE Usual scores revealed interactions between groups and periods. The post-hoc test revealed that the PRWE Specific scores (z = 3.43, p = 0.02) and PRWE Usual scores (z = 7.53, p<0.01) were significantly lower in the AOT group than in the Non-AOT group at 4 weeks postoperatively, whereas PRWE Total scores (z = 3.29, p = 0.04) were lower at 8 weeks postoperatively.
conclusionsThese results suggested that AOT can improve hand-use difficulties in right-handed women after DRF surgery. AOT positively affects the motor imagery of patients with DRF and can reverse the patient's perceived difficulty in using the fractured hand during rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.