Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39423185›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

The economic cost of malaria in Brazil from the perspective of the public health system.

Mônica V Andrade, Kenya Noronha, Valéria Silva, Henrique Bracarense, Lucas Carvalho, Daniel Nogueira da Silva, Aline Souza, André Soares Motta-Santos, Cassio Peterka, Marcia C Castro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mônica V AndradeCenter of Regional Planning and Development, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Cedeplar-UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6821-1598
Kenya NoronhaCenter of Regional Planning and Development, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Cedeplar-UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7174-6710
Valéria SilvaCenter of Regional Planning and Development, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Cedeplar-UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Henrique BracarenseCenter of Regional Planning and Development, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Cedeplar-UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Lucas CarvalhoCenter of Regional Planning and Development, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Cedeplar-UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3618-3967
Daniel Nogueira da SilvaCenter of Regional Planning and Development, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Cedeplar-UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Aline SouzaCenter of Regional Planning and Development, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Cedeplar-UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8860-9643
André Soares Motta-SantosCenter of Regional Planning and Development, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Cedeplar-UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Cassio PeterkaSecretaria de Vigilância em Saúde e Ambiente, Ministério da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Marcia C CastroDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4606-2795

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents an economic evaluation aimed at estimating malaria-related health care expenditures in Brazil from the perspective of the public health system. Comprehensive estimates of the costs of malaria remain scarce, in part because of limited data. Brazil has a universal health system (Sistema Único de Saúde-SUS) in which all cases of malaria are diagnosed and treated. In addition, antimalarial drugs are only available through the SUS. We compiled comprehensive data from multiple administrative sources. Expenditure indicators were calculated for municipalities and states in the Brazilian Amazon, a region where more than 99% of the country's malaria cases are concentrated. We also developed a digital platform that allows interactive visualization of the malaria cost indicators, disaggregated by cost type and geography. Our results show that control and prevention activities are the primary cost in all states, followed by human resources and disease treatment. Expenditures per malaria notification in the Amazon ranged from PPP (purchasing power parity)-US$59.00 (2017) to PPP-US$77.00 (2016), while per capita expenditures remained relatively stable at around PPP-US$3.50. The malaria cost estimates presented here contribute to a better negotiation of the financial resources needed by the NMCP and are one of the critical pieces of information for a strategic plan of activities needed to achieve the elimination goal.

Identifiers

PMID39423185
PMCPMC11488710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.