Observational studyUrogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025
Patient Satisfaction and QoL in SUI: Results With Single-Incision or Full-Length Slings.
Observational study in Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Vaginal Mesh Exposure After Single-Incision vs Full-Length Midurethral Sling Placement: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceUnderstanding treatment impact on quality of life of patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in the short- and long-term is vital to optimizing treatment success.
objectivesThis study aimed to report 36-month patient satisfaction and quality of life results from a 522 study of single-incision and full-length slings in SUI. STUDY
designThis was a secondary analysis of the Altis 522 study, a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, noninferiority cohort study comparing the Altis single-incision sling to full-length slings for the treatment of SUI. The current study endpoints are patient-reported outcomes on quality of life related to continence status at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months, measured through patient-reported, validated questionnaires: Urogenital Distress Inventory, Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, and Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire.
resultsA total of 355 women underwent the sling procedure (184, Altis group; 171, comparator group). At 36 months, 140 (76.0%) of Altis and 101 (59.1%) of comparator group patients were assessed. Patient Global Impression of Improvement at 36 months indicated that 92.9% of Altis and 90.1% of comparator patients reported that their condition was "very much better" or "much better" ( P = 0.444). Urogenital Distress Inventory at 36 months indicated improvement in quality of life in both groups with a mean change from baseline of 41.7 ± 19.3 (Altis group; n = 140) versus 44.4 ± 22.2 (comparator group; n = 101) ( P = 0.305). The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire indicated average quality-of-life improvement of 50% in both groups from presurgery to 36 months, with a mean change from baseline of 51.8 ± 25.8 (Altis group) versus 50.2 ± 25.1 (comparator group) ( P = 0.619).
conclusionsThis 36-month study demonstrated the lasting, positive effect that surgical intervention can have on patients with SUI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.