Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39422839›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2024

Gadolinium-based coronary CT angiography on a clinical photon-counting-detector system: a dynamic circulating phantom study.

Dmitrij Kravchenko, Chiara Gnasso, U Joseph Schoepf, Milan Vecsey-Nagy, Giuseppe Tremamunno, Jim O'Doherty, Andrew Zhang, Julian A Luetkens, Daniel Kuetting, Ulrike Attenberger and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. K-Edge imaging using a clinical dual-source photon-counting CT system.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Dmitrij Kravchenko *Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Chiara Gnasso *Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
U Joseph SchoepfDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Milan Vecsey-NagyDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Giuseppe TremamunnoDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Jim O'DohertyDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Andrew ZhangDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Julian A LuetkensDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Daniel KuettingDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Ulrike AttenbergerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Bernhard SchmidtSiemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany.
Akos Varga-SzemesDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Tilman EmrichDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. tilman.emrich@unimedizin-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4156-7727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) offers non-invasive diagnostics of the coronary arteries. Vessel evaluation requires the administration of intravenous contrast. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) as an alternative to iodinated contrast for CCTA on a first-generation clinical dual-source photon-counting-detector (PCD)-CT system.

methodsA dynamic circulating phantom containing a three-dimensional-printed model of the thoracic aorta and the coronary arteries were used to evaluate injection protocols using gadopentetate dimeglumine at 50%, 100%, 150%, and 200% of the maximum approved clinical dose (0.3 mmol/kg). Virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) reconstructions ranging from 40 keV to 100 keV with 5 keV increments were generated on a PCD-CT. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated from attenuations measured in the aorta and coronary arteries and noise measured in the background tissue. Attenuation of at least 350 HU was deemed as diagnostic.

resultsThe highest coronary attenuation (441 ± 23 HU, mean ± standard deviation) and CNR (29.5 ± 1.5) was achieved at 40 keV and at the highest GBCA dose (200%). There was a systematic decline of attenuation and CNR with higher keV reconstructions and lower GBCA doses. Only reconstructions at 40 and 45 keV at 200% and 40 keV at 150% GBCA dose demonstrated sufficient attenuation above 350 HU.

conclusionCurrent PCD-CT protocols and settings are unsuitable for the use of GBCA for CCTA at clinically approved doses. Future advances to the PCD-CT system including a 4-threshold mode, as well as multi-material decomposition may add new opportunities for k-edge imaging of GBCA. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Patients allergic to iodine-based contrast media and the future of multicontrast CT examinations would benefit greatly from alternative contrast media, but the utility of GBCA for coronary photon-counting-dector-CT angiography remains limited without further optimization of protocols and scanner settings. KEY POINTS: GBCA-enhanced coronary PCD-CT angiography is not feasible at clinically approved doses. GBCAs have potential applications for the visualization of larger vessels, such as the aorta, on PCD-CT angiography. Higher GBCA doses and lower keV reconstructions achieved higher attenuation values and CNR.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyContrast MediaCoronary AngiographyPhantoms, ImagingGadolinium DTPAHumansPhotonsContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAAorta (thoracic)Computed tomography angiographyContrast mediaCoronary vesselsGadolinium-DTPA

Identifiers

PMID39422839
PMCPMC11489376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.