ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024
Prognostic impact of lateral sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green on oncological outcomes for clinical stage II/III lower rectal cancer without suspected lateral lymph node metastasis.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Augmented reality with intraoperative indocyanine green lymphatic mapping in colorectal cancer: personalized surgery or a glowing distraction? A scoping review.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can detect occult nodal metastasis. We have previously reported the safety and feasibility of indocyanine green (ICG)-guided SLNB for clinical stage II/III lower rectal cancer (RC). However, little is known about the influence of lateral pelvic SLNB using ICG on oncological outcomes. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of lateral pelvic SLNB on oncological outcomes compared with prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection (LLND).
methodsParticipants comprised consecutive patients with clinical stage II/III lower RC who underwent lateral pelvic SLNB or prophylactic LLND (Non-SLNB) between January 2010 and December 2020. The primary outcome measure was the 5-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR). Secondary endpoints included cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS).
resultsAmong the 150 eligible patients included, 79 patients underwent lateral pelvic SLNB. Of those 79 patients, 4 patients who were SLNB-positive underwent LLND. LLND was omitted for the 75 patients who were SLNB-negative. Median follow-up was 61.0 months (range, 1.3-143.2 months). The overall recurrence rate was 30.7% (46 patients), with LR in 12.0% (18 patients). LR comprised lateral lymph node recurrence in 2.6% and central pelvic recurrence in 9.4%. No significant differences were seen between groups in terms of the frequency of LR or in CSS, OS, RFS, LRFS, or DRFS.
conclusionOncological outcomes were not different between the SLNB and Non-SLNB groups. ICG-guided SLNB appears promising as a method for determining indications for LLND.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39422803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.