Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39422798›Full record

ArticleMolecular diversity2025

Computational screening of umami tastants using deep learning.

Prantar Dutta, Kishore Gajula, Nitu Verma, Deepak Jain, Rakesh Gupta, Beena Rai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Prantar DuttaPhysical Sciences Research Area, TCS Research, Tata Consultancy Services, Pune, India.
Kishore GajulaPhysical Sciences Research Area, TCS Research, Tata Consultancy Services, Pune, India.
Nitu VermaPhysical Sciences Research Area, TCS Research, Tata Consultancy Services, Pune, India.
Deepak JainPhysical Sciences Research Area, TCS Research, Tata Consultancy Services, Pune, India.
Rakesh GuptaPhysical Sciences Research Area, TCS Research, Tata Consultancy Services, Pune, India. gupta.rakesh2@tcs.com.
Beena RaiPhysical Sciences Research Area, TCS Research, Tata Consultancy Services, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Umami, a fundamental human taste modality, refers to the savory flavors in meats and broths, often associated with monosodium glutamate and protein richness. With limited knowledge of umami molecules, the food industry seeks efficient approaches for identifying novel tastants. In this study, we have devised a virtual screening pipeline for identifying highly potent umami tastants from large molecular databases. We curated the most extensive classification dataset containing 439 umami and 428 non-umami molecules and trained a transformer-based architecture to differentiate between the two classes, achieving 93% accuracy. Additionally, we built a neural network model for predicting the potency of umami compounds, the first effort of its kind. The classification and potency prediction models were combined with similarity analysis and toxicity screening to build an end-to-end virtual framework for the rational discovery of novel tastants. We applied this framework to the FooDB database containing around 70,000 molecules as an illustrative use case for screening potent umami compounds. The screened molecules were validated using molecular docking with the umami taste receptor. This study demonstrates the potential of data-driven methods in discovering new tastants from structural and chemical features of molecules and proposes an efficient implementation for industrial applications.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFlavoring AgentsTasteHumansMolecular Docking SimulationNeural Networks, ComputerReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledFlavoring AgentsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledComputational screeningDeep learningQSPRTastantUmami

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.