ArticleMolecular diversity2025
Computational screening of umami tastants using deep learning.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and characterization of umami peptides from enzymatic hydrolysates of cod skin based on sensory evaluation and molecular simulations.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Integrated transcriptomic analysis identifies liver aging-driven fibrosis signatures and reveals therapeutic strategies based on medicine-food homology.NPJ science of food · 2026Article
- UmamiPredict: machine learning model to predict umami taste of molecules and peptides.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Umami, a fundamental human taste modality, refers to the savory flavors in meats and broths, often associated with monosodium glutamate and protein richness. With limited knowledge of umami molecules, the food industry seeks efficient approaches for identifying novel tastants. In this study, we have devised a virtual screening pipeline for identifying highly potent umami tastants from large molecular databases. We curated the most extensive classification dataset containing 439 umami and 428 non-umami molecules and trained a transformer-based architecture to differentiate between the two classes, achieving 93% accuracy. Additionally, we built a neural network model for predicting the potency of umami compounds, the first effort of its kind. The classification and potency prediction models were combined with similarity analysis and toxicity screening to build an end-to-end virtual framework for the rational discovery of novel tastants. We applied this framework to the FooDB database containing around 70,000 molecules as an illustrative use case for screening potent umami compounds. The screened molecules were validated using molecular docking with the umami taste receptor. This study demonstrates the potential of data-driven methods in discovering new tastants from structural and chemical features of molecules and proposes an efficient implementation for industrial applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39422798What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.