Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39422786›Full record

SynthesisAIDS and behavior2025

HIV Prevention Product Acceptability and Preference Among Women in Sub-Saharan Africa to Inform Novel Biomedical Options in Development: A Systematic Review.

Wanzirai Makoni, Lara Lorenzetti, Noah Mancuso, Ellen Luecke, Nhi Dinh, Ashwini S Deshpande, Marie Shoen, Definate Nhamo, Francis M Simmonds, Alejandro Baez and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AIDS and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Acceptability of the live biotherapeutic LACTIN-V (Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wanzirai MakoniPangaea Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Lara LorenzettiFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Noah MancusoWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Ellen LueckeWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Nhi DinhFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Ashwini S DeshpandeFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Marie ShoenFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Definate NhamoPangaea Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Francis M SimmondsPangaea Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Alejandro BaezWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Thesla Palanee-PhillipsWits RHI, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Alexandra M MinnisWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA. aminnis@rti.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2943-2005

Funding

USAID #7200AA22CA00002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of several HIV prevention options may allow women to choose a product that suits their lifestyle and preferences. Product attributes and contextual factors influence product acceptability, which affects uptake and effective use. We conducted a systematic review of acceptability and preference for biomedical HIV prevention products among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to inform the development of novel products. We used a comprehensive strategy to search three databases for peer-reviewed literature from SSA published between January 2015 and December 2023. A two-stage review process assessed references against eligibility criteria. Data were abstracted using a standardized spreadsheet, then organized by constructs from two theoretical frameworks of acceptability. Results were synthesized based on product classes defined by route of administration. We identified 408 unique references; 100 references met eligibility criteria. References assessed oral PrEP (n = 65), vaginal ring (n = 44), long-acting systemic products (injectable, implant, microarray patch) (n = 28), and other vaginal products (film, insert, gel) (n = 20). Over two-thirds reported qualitative or mixed-methods data, primarily from adolescent girls and young women. Frequent dosing, especially noted for daily oral PrEP, and perceived/experienced side effects were notably negative influences. Most end-users preferred long-acting products (systemically or vaginally delivered), though on-demand products offering user control were also valued. Influencing factors, especially partners, shaped end-user perceptions of product attributes and acceptability. All products were linked to at least some barriers to uptake and/or use, highlighting the need to provide end-users with a range of options and assist them in identifying one that best suits their circumstances and needs. Biomedical HIV prevention development should advance products that address gaps in available options while optimizing favorable product attributes to achieve high acceptability that ultimately supports adoption and use.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient PreferencePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAfrica South of the SaharaContraceptive Devices, FemaleFemaleHumansAcceptabilityBiomedical optionsHIV preventionPreferencesSub-Saharan AfricaSystematic reviewWomen

Identifiers

PMID39422786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.