Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39422785›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

What individual needs do family caregivers have in palliative home care and how are they supported? A qualitative study of a supportive intervention.

Christiane Kreyer, Barbara Stecher, Sabine Pleschberger, Gail Ewing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Psychological distress, quality of life, needs, and resources among informal caregivers in specialist palliative home care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christiane KreyerDepartment of Nursing Science and Gerontology, UMIT TIROL-Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria. christiane.kreyer@umit-tirol.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7395-5631
Barbara StecherDepartment of Nursing Science and Gerontology, UMIT TIROL-Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Sabine PleschbergerCentre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gail EwingCentre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFamily caregivers (FCGs) play a pivotal role in supporting patients in palliative care at home. Person-centred support is crucial to prevent negative outcomes; therefore, evidence-based approaches such as the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool Intervention (CSNAT-I) are promising. To understand more about the delivery of the intervention, the study focuses on documentation of CSNAT-I in practice in Austria to identify which support needs were discussed with the FCGs and the types of support delivered to meet these needs.

methodsA retrospective analysis of electronic records was conducted, focusing on documented entries related to the delivery of CSNAT-I over a 21-month period (Dec 2019 to Aug 2021). Both qualitative and quantitative methods were employed for data analysis.

resultsThe analysis identified a wide spectrum of FCG support needs, categorised into enabling domains related to caregiving for the patient and direct support needs concerning FCGs' own health and well-being. The most frequently documented support needs included 'having time for oneself in the day' and 'dealing with feelings and worries', highlighting the challenges FCGs face in balancing caregiving responsibilities with personal life. Supportive input encompassed advice and information, counselling, education and training, coordination and arrangement, and signposting and referral.

conclusionThe study stresses the importance of addressing both practical and psychosocial aspects of caregiving, utilising a person-centred approach. Nurses provided comprehensive support mostly directly delivered during their contact with FCGs. CSNAT-I demonstrated flexibility, accommodating the diverse needs of FCGs in different situations, and may contribute to a more supportive care environment.

Indexed as

CaregiversHome Care ServicesNeeds AssessmentPalliative CareQualitative ResearchSocial SupportAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustriaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCaregiver supportCarer Support Needs Assessment Tool Intervention (CSNAT-I)Family caregiversPalliative home care

Identifiers

PMID39422785
PMCPMC11489160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.