ArticleParasitology research2024
Molecular and microscopic detection of haemoprotozoan diseases in dogs from Haryana, India.
Article in Parasitology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular investigation and genomic profiling of Anaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis infections in dogs from Punjab, India.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Molecular prevalence and clinical profiles of canine babesiosis in northern India.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- High burden and spatial clustering of canine hemoparasitic infections in southern Thailand: A molecular survey of free-roaming dogs.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Comparative diagnostic performance of microscopy and PCR assays with preliminary mitochondrial sequence analysis of Babesia species infecting dogs in Jabalpur, central India.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Hepatozoon infections in domestic and wild Carnivora: etiology, prevalence, clinical disease, diagnosis and treatment, and redescription of Hepatozoon silvestris, H. martis, and H. ursi.Parasites & vectors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Haemoparasitic infections are frequently observed in dogs from tropical regions, including India. The present investigation combined microscopic blood smear examination and PCR assays to assess the occurrence of canine tick-borne diseases (CTBD) from suspected dogs in and around Hisar, Haryana. Using the Giemsa-stained peripheral thin blood smear examination, 15 (12.5%) of the 120 dogs were infected with CTBD, with 5.8%, 3.3%, 2.5%, and 0.8% dogs testing positive for Hepatozoon canis, Ehrlichia canis, Babesia vogeli, and Babesia gibsoni, respectively. Using the PCR assay, CTBD was found to be 64.16% (77/120) in examined dogs. Of the 77 PCR-positive canines, 56 were infected with a single haemoparasite, while 21 were infected with two or more species. H. canis was the most abundant tick-borne pathogen, representing 35%, followed by E. canis 25.8%, B. vogeli 20%, and B. gibsoni 2.5%. The most common co-infection was with H. canis along with E. canis (7.5%). The PCR assay was proven to be more efficient for detecting haemoparasites in dogs compared to blood smear examinations. The study suggests that canine tick-borne diseases are common in Haryana and recommends using PCR-based molecular tests in addition to conventional microscopic examination to diagnose these infections for effective treatment and management of infected canines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39422774What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.