Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39422752›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2024

A scoping review of patient safety checklists in dentistry.

K Zouaidi, T W Miner, M F Walji, E Kalenderian, D B Rindal, K J Suda

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Generators of Inequality and Inequity Affecting Dental Patient Safety: A Grounded Theory Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K ZouaidiTexas Center for Oral Healthcare Quality and Safety, UTHealth Houston School of Dentistry, 7500 Cambridge St, Houston, TX, 77054, USA.
T W MinerCenter for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3609 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
M F WaljiDepartment of Clinical and Health Informatics, McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, UTHealth Science Center Houston, 7000 Fannin St Suite 600, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA.
E KalenderianOffice of the Dean, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, 1801 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
D B RindalCenter for Oral Health Integration, HealthPartners Dental Group, HealthPartners Institute, Associate Dental Director for Research, International College of Dentists, 8170 33rd Avenue South, MS 21112R, P.O. Box 1524, Minneapolis, MN, 55440-1524, USA.
K J SudaCenter for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3609 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. KSUDA@pitt.edu.

Funding

Pediatric Adverse Event Risk Reduction for High Risk Medications in Children and Adolescents: Improving Pediatric Patient Safety in Dental PracticesR01DE030657 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KJ Suda · 2022 to 2026
$4.2M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE030657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNot much is known about safety checklists use in dentistry. We aim to examine, assess, and provide a comprehensive understanding of the current knowledge concerning the use of checklists to improve patient safety in dentistry.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature search using Medline and Embase for studies that use or describe the development of dental patient safety checklists. All study designs were included for citations published through December 2023.

resultsFollowing abstract and full-text screening, 27 studies remained for data extraction and analysis. Oral surgery emerged as the main dental specialty where the utilization and evaluation of checklists were primarily concentrated (n = 15). The majority of the included studies described either checklist development, their implementation, or both (n = 18). Only 6 studies assessed the effectiveness of checklists in improving patient safety outcomes. Of the effectiveness studies, five found a decrease in incidents and dental adverse events, along with an improvement in patient care and safety, associated with the use of checklists.

conclusionsThis scoping review highlights the limited current knowledge regarding checklist use and effectiveness in reducing adverse events across dental practices; it demonstrates the need on how to best guide the profession towards implementing this important evidence-based patient safety tool. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Checklists are effective tools to improve patient safety and have become integral to medical practice. Dentistry can also benefit from these tools to improve patient safety.

Indexed as

ChecklistDentistryPatient SafetyHumansChecklistsDentistryPatient Safety

Identifiers

PMID39422752
PMCPMC11909416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.