Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39422737›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025

Postmortem interval estimation of human skeletonized remains through luminol chemiluminescence.

Catarina Ermida, Joana Rosa, Eugénia Cunha, Maria Teresa Ferreira

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Catarina ErmidaDepartment of Life Sciences, Centre for Functional Ecology (CFE), Laboratory of Forensic Anthropology, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, 3000-456, Portugal. ermidacatarina@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4995-8266
Joana RosaDepartment of Life Sciences, Centre for Functional Ecology (CFE), Laboratory of Forensic Anthropology, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, 3000-456, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1556-8390
Eugénia CunhaDepartment of Life Sciences, Centre for Functional Ecology (CFE), Laboratory of Forensic Anthropology, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, 3000-456, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2998-371X
Maria Teresa FerreiraDepartment of Life Sciences, Centre for Functional Ecology (CFE), Laboratory of Forensic Anthropology, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, Coimbra, 3000-456, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2437-7780

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postmortem interval (PMI) estimation represents a significant challenge in the forensic sciences, particularly when dealing with human skeletal remains. A screening protocol for distinguishing possible remains of forensic interest is a crucial tool for judicial purposes. In this context, luminol chemiluminescence emerges as a promising method, with low overall costs and required time. This method is primarily used as a presumptive test, based on the understanding that the intensity of the chemiluminescence reactions decreases with an increase in the postmortem interval, thus underlining its practical implications.This research aims to expand previous research on the potential of luminol chemiluminescence, evaluating its usefulness in estimating PMI. Our sample comprised 239 human clavicles, with known PMI. The luminol solution was sprayed on each powder bone sample in a dark room, observed by the naked eye and photographed. The intensity of the chemiluminescence reaction was measured using a binary and a 5-level scale.The present results reveal that this method is a suitable tool for PMI estimation as a presumptive test, reducing time and costs in criminal investigations. The findings underscore the high sensitivity of luminol chemiluminescence for detecting recent PMI but also highlight a notable incidence of false positives. Thus, our results confirm luminol chemiluminescence as a powerful tool for dating time of death, particularly for identifying forensic relevant remains. Still, the relatively low specificity indicates that it should be complemented with additional tests for further confirmation and scientific validation of the remains' forensic relevance.

Indexed as

LuminescenceLuminescent AgentsLuminescent MeasurementsLuminolPostmortem ChangesAdultFemaleForensic AnthropologyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultLuminescent AgentsLuminolChemiluminescenceForensic AnthropologyHuman skeletal remainsLuminolPostmortem interval

Identifiers

PMID39422737
PMCPMC11732887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.