SynthesisEuropean radiology2025
MRI deep learning models for assisted diagnosis of knee pathologies: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Zero echo time MRI with deep learning reconstruction and chemical shift correction for detecting osteolytic myeloma lesions.European radiology experimental · 2026Trial
- Comparison of Deep-Learning-Based Reconstruction of Knee MRI with Conventional Sequences in Patients with Knee Pain.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Diagnosing Knee Lesions: Where Are We Now?Cureus · 2026Review
- Comprehensive deep learning-assisted multi-condition analysis of knee MRI studies improves resident radiologist performance.European radiology · 2026Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of knee injuries after skiing in adolescents under deep learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advancing deep learning based knee cartilage segmentation in MRI: Innovations, challenges and applications.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2026Article
- Self-supervised learning with BYOL for anterior cruciate ligament tear detection from knee MRI.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Initial [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Bayesian Graphical Models for Multiscale Inference in Medical Image-Based Joint Degeneration Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- [Current Landscape and Commercialization of AI Models in Musculoskeletal Imaging].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025Review
- Hierarchical classification of anterior cruciate ligament using deep learning for athletes healthcare.BioImpacts : BI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDespite showing encouraging outcomes, the precision of deep learning (DL) models using different convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for diagnosis remains under investigation. This systematic review aims to summarise the status of DL MRI models developed for assisting the diagnosis of a variety of knee abnormalities. MATERIALS AND
methodsFive databases were systematically searched, employing predefined terms such as 'Knee AND 3D AND MRI AND DL'. Selected inclusion criteria were used to screen publications by title, abstract, and full text. The synthesis of results was performed by two independent reviewers.
resultsFifty-four articles were included. The studies focused on anterior cruciate ligament injuries (n = 19, 36%), osteoarthritis (n = 9, 17%), meniscal injuries (n = 13, 24%), abnormal knee appearance (n = 11, 20%), and other (n = 2, 4%). The DL models in this review primarily used the following CNNs: ResNet (n = 11, 21%), VGG (n = 6, 11%), DenseNet (n = 4, 8%), and DarkNet (n = 3, 6%). DL models showed high-performance metrics compared to ground truth. DL models for the detection of a specific injury outperformed those by up to 4.5% for general abnormality detection.
conclusionDespite the varied study designs used among the reviewed articles, DL models showed promising outcomes in the assisted detection of selected knee pathologies by MRI. This review underscores the importance of validating these models with larger MRI datasets to close the existing gap between current DL model performance and clinical requirements. KEY POINTS: Question What is the status of DL model availability for knee pathology detection in MRI and their clinical potential? Findings Pathology-specific DL models reported higher accuracy compared to DL models for the detection of general abnormalities of the knee. DL model performance was mainly influenced by the quantity and diversity of data available for model training. Clinical relevance These findings should encourage future developments to improve patient care, support personalised diagnosis and treatment, optimise costs, and advance artificial intelligence-based medical imaging practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.