ArticleCritical care explorations2024
Ultra-Low-Field Portable MRI and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Preclinical Safety Testing.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextConventional MRI is incompatible with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cannulas and pumps. Ultra-low-field portable MRI (ULF-pMRI) with 0.064 Tesla may provide a solution, but its safety and compatibility is unknown. HYPOTHESIS: ULF-pMRI does not cause significant displacement and heating of ECMO cannulas and does not affect ECMO pump function. METHODS AND MODELS: ECMO cannulas in various sizes were tested ex vivo using phantom models to assess displacement force and heating according to the American Society for Testing and Materials criteria. ECMO pump function was assessed by pump flow and power consumption. In vivo studies involved five female domestic pigs (20-42 kg) undergoing different ECMO configurations (peripheral and central cannulation) and types of cannulas with an imaging protocol consisting of T2-weighted, T1-weighted, FLuid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery, and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences.
resultsPhantom models demonstrated that ECMO cannulas, both single lumen with various sizes (15-24-Fr) and double lumen cannula, had average displacement force less than gravitational force within 5 gauss safety line of ULF-pMRI and temperature changes less than 1°C over 15 minutes of scanning and ECMO pump maintained stable flow and power consumption immediately outside of the 5 gauss line. All pig models showed no visible motion due to displacement force or heating of the cannulas. ECMO flow and the animals' hemodynamic status maintained stability, with no changes greater than 10%, respectively. INTERPRETATION AND
conclusionsULF-pMRI is safe and feasible for use with standard ECMO configurations, supporting its clinical application as a neuroimaging modality in ECMO patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.