Trial reportCancer2025
Phase 2 trial of avelumab in combination with gemcitabine in advanced leiomyosarcoma as a second-line treatment (EAGLES, Korean Cancer Study Group UN18-09).
Trial report in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Pleomorphism in Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Molecular Characteristics and Clinical Features.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Vulnerabilities of the Key Genetic Drivers in Leiomyosarcoma.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Review onPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Risk comparison of adverse reactions between gemcitabine monotherapy and gemcitabine combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer: insights from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- Overview on biomarkers for immune oncology drugs.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn this single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 trial, the authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of avelumab plus gemcitabine in patients with leiomyosarcoma (LMS) who failed on first-line chemotherapy.
methodsPatients with advanced LMS received avelumab 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 (for up to 24 months) plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m
resultsIn total, 38 patients were enrolled. Of these, 35 patients were evaluable, and the ORR was 20% (95% confidence interval; [CI], 8%-37%). The disease control rate was 71%, and the median duration of response was 21.8 months (range, 7.6 to ≥43.3 months). The median progression free-survival was 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.5-6.8 months), and the median overall survival was 27.5 months (95% CI, 20.4-34.6 months). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 70% of patients, of which neutropenia was the most common (54%). Immune-mediated adverse events occurred in five patients (14%; hypothyroidism, n = 3; hepatitis, n = 2). Patients who had a higher density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (greater than the median) exhibited better ORR (35% vs. 8%; p = .104), progression-free survival (median, 7.3 vs. 3.3 months; p = .024), and overall survival (median, not reached vs. 21.5 months; p = .027).
conclusionsThe combination of avelumab and gemcitabine demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety in patients with advanced LMS who progressed on first-line therapy. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density may be an important factor in predicting the response to combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.